Title
People vs. Dalabajan
Case
G.R. No. 105668
Decision Date
Oct 16, 1997
On January 1, 1986, Amado Zabalo Jr. was killed during a New Year's celebration. Accused claimed self-defense, but the Supreme Court upheld their murder conviction, citing credible eyewitness testimony and treachery, despite recantations and desistance affidavits.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 105668)

Factual Background

The incident occurred during a New Year celebration on January 1, 1986, at Barangay Cayapas, Dumaran, Palawan. The prosecution presented testaments from several witnesses, notably Melencio dela Cruz, who observed Hernando attacking Amado Zabalo, Jr. and testified that other Dalabajan relatives joined him. After the attackers chased the victim into the water, the witnesses reported that the victim was severely assaulted with bladed weapons and blunt objects, leading to his death.

Evidence and Testimonies

In the trial, several witnesses testified about the circumstances surrounding the assault. Amado's father, Amado Zabalo, Sr., confirmed the news of his son's death upon arrival at the scene, while police officer Lolito Carceller provided details of the victim's injuries based on his examination. The defense, represented by the Dalabajans, provided alternative narratives. Hernando claimed self-defense, asserting he was attacked first.

Development of the Case

In the course of the proceedings, the charges against co-accused Megdonio Sabinet, Napoleon dela Torre, and Charlie Paduga were dismissed due to insufficient evidence, leaving only the Dalabajan defendants in the case. The trial continued, with significant witness testimony supporting the prosecution's claims.

Recantation of Witness Testimony

On February 26, 1990, Amado Zabalo, Sr. executed an Affidavit of Desistance, which expressed his withdrawal of the complaint against the Dalabajans, stating that they were not involved in his son's death. Subsequently, on July 31, 1990, witness Melencio Dela Cruz also executed an affidavit recanting his earlier testimony, claiming he had falsely testified under duress from the victim's family.

Trial Court Ruling

The trial court found the Dalabajans guilty of murder, emphasizing that the assault was characterized by treachery, evident premeditation, and took advantage of superior strength. They were sentenced to reclusion perpetua and ordered to pay damages to the victim's heirs.

Appeal and Argumentation

The Dalabajans appealed the decision, asserting they were denied the presumption of innocence and that the trial court erroneously weighed the credibility of witness testimonies, including Dela Cruz's recantation. The appeal argued that their conviction was unwarranted and requested a re-examination of the case based on newly discovered evidence (the recantations).

Supreme Court Decision

The Suprem

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.