Case Summary (G.R. No. 118620-21)
Charges and Arraignment
The appellant, Narito Dadles, faced two separate informations for kidnapping and serious illegal detention, specifying that he, along with five unidentified co-accused, unlawfully took Alipio Tehidor and Dionisio Tehidor, and later Salvador Alipan and Antonio Alipan from their residences under armed force, thereby depriving them of their civil liberties. Only the appellant was arraigned, and he entered a plea of not guilty. The cases against his co-accused have been temporarily archived pending their apprehension.
Prosecution Witnesses and Testimonies
Witnesses for the prosecution included family members of the victims who testified to the events of that night. They recounted how the accused and several accomplices arrived at their homes, calling for the victims, and upon gaining entry under the pretense of wanting to talk, proceeded to kidnap them. The testimonies indicated that the victims were forcibly taken and their hands tied, further supported by witness accounts that they were threatened with violence if any resistance was shown or if the incident was reported to authorities.
Defense and Alibi
The defense presented an alibi, claiming that the appellant was at the home of fellow resident Rogelio Ariola on the night of the incident. Ariola testified that the appellant was with him and guests until late that night, making it impossible for him to participate in the kidnappings. However, the court found this alibi inadequate, stating it did not sufficiently counter the prosecution's evidence of the appellant's involvement.
Court's Findings on Credibility and Evidence
The court emphasized the credibility of the eyewitness testimonies over the defense's alibi. The prosecution's witnesses expressed fear for their safety, which hindered immediate reporting to authorities, a factor that did not diminish their credibility. Additionally, the court observed that hesitation in reporting crimes in rural areas is common and should not inherently undermine a witness's account.
Appellant's Assignments of Error
The appellant raised two primary assignments of error: claiming that the trial court placed excessive weight on the prosecution's evidence while disregarding the defense's; and that the prosecution failed to establish that the purpose of the kidnappings was to deprive the victims of their liberty. The court, however, found significant evidence indicating the victims were taken against their will, and the intent to deprive them of liberty was clear.
Ruling and Sentencing
Ultimately, the court concluded that the appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of two counts of slight illegal detention instead of the more severe char
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 118620-21)
Case Background
- The case revolves around the alleged kidnapping of four individuals: Alipio Tehidor, his son Dionisio Tehidor, Salvador Alipan, and his son Antonio Alipan.
- The incidents took place on May 24, 1989, in Barangay Amontay, Binalbagan, Negros Occidental.
- Narito alias aNaringa Dadles was charged with kidnapping under two separate informations.
- The appellant was the only accused arraigned; others involved remain at large.
Arraignment and Trial
- At the arraignment, Narito Dadles pleaded not guilty to both counts of kidnapping.
- The cases were consolidated and jointly tried upon the agreement of the Public Prosecutor and the defense counsel.
Prosecution Evidence
Testimony of Francisca Tehidor and Danilo Tehidor:
- The Tehidors were awakened around 11:00 PM by Narito and his five companions.
- They were familiar with the group as they had previously visited for rice.
- Upon entry, the group insisted on taking Alipio and Dionisio downstairs, despite Francisca's protests.
- Alipio and Dionisio were hogtied after Francisca was told they would be released if firearms belonging to their other sons were surrendered.
- Francisca has not heard from her husband or son since that night.
Testimony of Luzviminda Alipan and Vicente Alipan:
- The Alipans were similarly visited at around 11:30 PM by Narito and nine others.
- Luzviminda was assured that Salvador and Antonio would return the next day if they accompanied the group.
- Both Salvador and Antonio left w