Title
People vs. Daban y Ganzon
Case
G.R. No. L-31429
Decision Date
Dec 19, 1981
Roscoe Daban convicted of murder for shooting Conrado de la Cruz in 1967, using a car linked to him, affirmed by the Supreme Court despite alibi claims.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-31429)

Charges and Trial

Roscoe Daban was convicted of murder for the shooting death of Conrado de la Cruz, and the trial court sentenced him to death while ordering Daban to pay an indemnity of twelve thousand pesos to De la Cruz's heirs. The case originated in the Court of First Instance of Iloilo under Criminal Case No. 11863.

Incident Details

On July 17, 1967, Daban, along with accomplices, was in a red 1965 Chevrolet Malibu when he shot De la Cruz multiple times while the latter leaned against a parked jeep. Following the shooting, Daban fled the scene, and De la Cruz died shortly thereafter at Polyclinic Hospital due to gunshot wounds to his chest, abdomen, and arm.

Evidence and Investigation

The investigation conducted by Lieutenant Colonel Margate revealed that shortly after the shooting, the car involved was seen being repainted in a local auto shop. Witnesses, including the owner of the shop, testified that the car was brought in for immediate repainting, indicating an attempt to conceal its identity. Evidence found in the glove compartment linked the car to Roscoe Daban.

Eyewitness Testimony

Vicente Felisario, a bystander, provided crucial eyewitness testimony, stating he saw Daban shoot De la Cruz from a close distance. Despite the defense's attempts to create doubt about Felisario’s identification—particularly regarding Daban's description—Felisario’s credibility as a witness remained intact even through rigorous cross-examination.

Defense Arguments

Daban mounted an alibi defense, claiming he was in Bacolod City at the time of the crime. His defense presented witnesses asserting that the assailant did not match Daban's physical characteristics. However, the trial court found these claims lacking credibility compared to Felisario's testimony.

Failure to Testify

Daban did not testify in his defense, which the trial court noted but also acknowledged such inaction should not prejudice the accused's standing in court. However, it took into consideration his failure to deny incriminating evidence, interpreting this as an indication of guilt rather than as a definitive conclusion.

Conviction and Conclusion

The trial court concluded that the evidence, particularly the eyewitness identification, adequately established Daban's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The court emphasized the nature of the crime—executed with treachery in broad daylight—and characterized it as a cold-blooded assassin

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.