Title
People vs. Cuenca y Medrano
Case
G.R. No. 143819
Decision Date
Jan 29, 2002
Four neighbors mauled and stabbed Wilfredo Castillo, leading to his death. Conviction upheld based on credible eyewitness testimony, rejecting alibi defenses.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 143819)

Charge and Background

The formal charge against the appellants was established by the Information filed by Lipa City Assistant City Prosecutor Mario G. Mayuga, asserting that both accused had conspired and participated in the murder of Wilfredo Castillo, employing treachery and superior strength. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Lipa City ultimately found both guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced them to reclusion perpetua.

Prosecution's Version of Events

According to the prosecution, at approximately 9:30 PM on February 14, 1998, Morcillo observed from a distance as Cuenca and Agon, along with two other unidentified assailants, attacked and beat Castillo using wooden implements. Morcillo recognized all three assailants due to their familiarity as neighbors. After Castillo lost consciousness, Morcillo claimed the attackers carried his body toward a nearby highway. The following day, Castillo's body was discovered in a well, showing signs of severe physical injuries resulting from multiple stab wounds.

Defense's Version of Events

The defense brought forth an alibi, asserting that Cuenca and Agon were located at a different residence during the time of the crime. They claimed that other individuals were present and could corroborate their alibi. The defense contended that the lack of eyewitness testimony regarding how Castillo was stabbed undermined the prosecution's case.

Trial Court's Ruling

The RTC found Morcillo's testimony credible and detailed, concluding that it provided a vivid account of the events, thus supporting a finding of guilt based on conspiracy and treachery. The trial court rejected the appellants' defenses of denial and alibi. It determined that both accused actively participated in the killing, which was facilitated by their conspiracy.

Issues Raised by the Appellants

The appellants raised three main issues on appeal: (1) the weight given to Morcillo's testimony, (2) the trial court’s interpretation of the cause of death, suggesting that injuries caused by wood rather than stab wounds led to Castillo's death, and (3) the trial court's dismissal of their alibi.

Court's Assessment of Witness Credibility

The appellate court upheld the trial court’s assessment of the credibility of Morcillo’s eyewitness testimony, stating that the testimony was not undermined by minor inconsistencies. It reaffirmed the principle that a single credible witness could form a sufficient basis for conviction, emphasizing the quality over quantity of evidence.

Establishment of Cause of Death

Contrary to the appellants' argument, the appellate court maintained that circumstantial evidence, including Morcillo's eyewitness account and the autopsy findings indicating multiple stab wounds, pointed convincingly to their culpability. The finding of numerous stab wounds was decisive in establishing the manner of Castillo’s death, notwithstanding the defense’s claims.

Alibi and its Insufficiency

The appellate court noted that the defense of alibi is often considered weak and difficult to substantiate. The distance between the alleged location of the accused at the time of the murder and the crime scene was not sufficiently far to support the impossibility of presence. Thus, the court concluded that the appellants failed to convincingly establish their alibi.

Findings on Conspiracy and Treachery

The court affirmed the RTC's finding that treachery characterized the murder,

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.