Title
People vs. Cruz
Case
G.R. No. L-13219-20
Decision Date
Aug 31, 1960
A man, enraged by his wife's repeated separations, brutally attacked her and her sister with a bolo, claiming insanity. The court rejected his defense, upheld the marriage's validity, and convicted him of parricide and frustrated murder.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-13219-20)

Background of the Case

Remigio Cruz was charged with parricide and frustrated murder. He was convicted and sentenced to reclusion perpetua for the parricide of his wife, Natividad, and to an indeterminate sentence for the frustrated murder of his sister-in-law, Anita. The court also imposed civil indemnities to the heirs of the victims. The appellant contested his conviction through an appeal, arguing various points that underpin the case.

Relationship and Events Leading to the Crime

The marriage between Cruz and Natividad commenced in March 1953, but it was fraught with conflict, including physical abuse that prompted Natividad to leave him multiple times. Tensions escalated such that, on June 11, 1956, Cruz followed Natividad and their daughter to her parents’ home in Cabanatuan City. After strained interactions, an altercation arose between Cruz and Natividad, culminating in Cruz attacking both Natividad and Anita with a bolo.

Evidence Presented

During the trial, oral testimonies were admitted to prove the existence of Cruz’s marriage, overcoming the appellant's argument concerning the absence of a marriage certificate. Witnesses recounted the violent incident, including Cruz's sudden attack on his wife, which indicated his intent and state of mind during the commission of the crimes.

Defense Arguments

Cruz’s defense included claims of insanity at the time of the offenses, citing past hospitalizations for schizophrenia. He argued that his mental condition excused him from liability for the violent acts. However, the court emphasized the necessity of proving insanity as a complete deprivation of reason, which did not align with Cruz's behavior prior to and following the assaults.

Court's Findings on Insanity

The court assessed Cruz's mental state against the legal standard for insanity. It underscored that proof of insanity must demonstrate an absence of discernment during the commission of the act. Despite previous mental health issues, evidence revealed that Cruz was functioning ad

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.