Title
People vs. Cruz
Case
G.R. No. 60098
Decision Date
Apr 30, 1984
A 1979 murder case where Eduardo Mula Cruz was acquitted due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, delayed reporting, and insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 60098)

Summary of Events

The prosecution's case narrative indicates that at around 5:00 PM on April 11, 1979, while Modesto Alipio was walking home, he witnessed Cruz confronting Galpao. Cruz allegedly threatened Galpao regarding a debt and subsequently attacked him with a bolo, inflicting multiple fatal wounds. Despite Alipio witnessing the attack, he did not report the incident to the authorities immediately, under the belief that others present would do so.

Discovery of the Victim

Later that evening, the body of Julian Galpao was discovered near the Agno River, prompting local authorities, including the Barangay Captain and the police, to launch an investigation. The autopsy performed by Dr. Gil del Rosario revealed multiple incised wounds as the cause of death, corroborating the brutality of the assault described by Alipio.

Eyewitness Testimony

Over a month later, on May 7, 1979, Alipio disclosed his account of the events to Pedro Sanchez, an uncle of the victim, which led to his sworn statement to the police. At trial, Alipio unequivocally identified Cruz as the attacker. However, Cruz presented an alibi, asserting he was engaged in farming during the time of the incident and denied any connection to Galpao.

Evaluation of Evidence

The trial court convicted Cruz primarily based on Alipio's testimony. However, the appellate court found significant issues with the credibility of this testimony. The court noted that despite the presence of witnesses during the attack, no one, including Alipio, reported the incident to law enforcement immediately. The notable delay in Alipio's reporting raised doubts regarding his reliability and the authenticity of his account.

Principles of Criminal Law

Under the principles of criminal justice, the prosecution bears the burden of proof to establish the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The delay of forty-two days before Alipio provided his sworn statement led the court to question the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.