Title
People vs. Cruz
Case
G.R. No. 76728
Decision Date
Aug 30, 1988
Reynaldo Cruz convicted for illegal possession of unlicensed firearm and hand grenade; evidence deemed admissible despite inadmissible confession due to constitutional violations.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 76728)

Charges and Penalties

The charges stemmed from an incident that occurred on May 8, 1986, where Cruz was found in possession of a firearm and a grenade without the requisite license. Following a trial presided over by Judge Willelmo C. Fortun, Cruz was found guilty and sentenced to reclusion perpetua (life imprisonment) along with the forfeiture of the seized items to the government.

Sequence of Events

On May 9, 1986, law enforcement acting on intelligence information apprehended two car theft suspects who subsequently led officers to Cruz's sister's apartment. Upon entering, law enforcement found Cruz, along with gang members, and located items including the firearm and grenade under a bar. Cruz admitted ownership of these items when confronted by the arresting officers.

Admission of Ownership

Cruz's confession was recorded in a written statement after being informed of his constitutional rights. He claimed that the firearm and grenade belonged to another individual, Joey Flores. Cruz's defense argued that he had been subjected to maltreatment by police and that his confession was coerced.

Conflicting Testimonies

The appellant denied ownership of the firearm and grenade, asserting that the items were "planted" by the Philippine Constabulary. Testimonies from witnesses, including police officers, confirmed Cruz's admission of ownership and the chain of evidence maintained by the police.

Legal Issues – Warrantless Arrest and Confession

Cruz contended that the officers entered the premises without a warrant and that this violated his constitutional rights. However, the officers claimed they were permitted by the apartment owner to enter and act. The court found that the warrantless search leading to the discovery of the unlicensed firearm and grenade was justified, given the context of his arrest.

Impact of the Confession

Despite the issue raised regarding the confession being obtained under duress, the court emphasized that substantial evidence existed independent of Cruz’s extrajudi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.