Title
People vs. Cristobal, Jr. y Sarmiento
Case
G.R. No. L-32562
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1979
Four men conspired to rob a jeepney, resulting in the fatal stabbing of a passenger; their confessions and evidence led to convictions for robbery with homicide, with reclusion perpetua imposed.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-32562)

Charges and Court Proceedings

The defendants faced two charges: Robbery (CCC-VI-627) and Robbery with Homicide (CCC-VI-628). The Circuit Criminal Court of Manila found Cristobal, Duncil, and Valerio guilty of theft leading to Villanueva’s death, while Pagaduan's guilt was noted after he changed his plea. The court sentenced Cristobal, Duncil, and Valerio to death but later modified the imposed penalty to reclusion perpetua on appeal due to a lack of unanimous votes for the death penalty.

Activities Leading to the Crime

The events unfolded as the accused planned a robbery after a drinking session. They boarded a passenger jeepney with the intention of staging a hold-up. The operation turned violent when Villanueva resisted their attempts to steal his watch, leading to his stabbing by Cristobal. Fernandez witnessed the assault.

Eyewitness Testimony

Mario Fernandez and Melquiades San Jose, the jeepney driver, provided critical testimony regarding the robbery and murder. Fernandez described how Valerio attempted to restrain Villanueva, while Cristobal stabbed the victim. The witnesses' accounts were corroborated by the rapid sequence of events, despite some minor inconsistencies.

Investigative Findings

Following the crime, police apprehended Duncil and Pagaduan after spotting them attempting to evade capture. Blood-stained clothing was found on Duncil, and Pagaduan was found with an Omega wristwatch claimed by Fernandez as his own. This led to further investigations and the eventual capture of Cristobal, who confessed to his involvement and identified the watch he had stolen.

Defense Claims

The defense argued against the validity of the evidence, including confessions made by the accused. They contended that the confessions were coerced and denied that the Seiko watch belonged to Villanueva. Each defendant attempted to distance themselves from the major acts of violence while asserting that they acted individually without a cohesive plan; however, the prosecution demonstrated a clear conspiracy.

Legal Principles Applied

The trial court established that conspiracy amongst the accused existed, warranting shared liability. In custodial situations, each accused's actions during the robbery led to serious outcomes, forming a basis for the classification of the crime as robbery with homicide under Philippine law.

Evaluation of Aggravating Circumstances

The court considered several aggravating factors such as the presence of craft and nighttime. However, the court corrected its initial consideration of nighttime as an aggravating circumstance, determining that the robbery was not premeditated to take advantage of darkness, especially since the crime occurred in a we

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.