Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Corral y Batalla
Case
G.R. No. 233883
Decision Date
Jan 7, 2019
Accused acquitted due to prosecution's failure to comply with chain of custody requirements in a drug case, compromising evidence integrity.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 233883)

Case Background

This case arises from three Informations filed against Mark Vincent Corral y Batalla, accusing him of Illegal Sale and Illegal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, following a buy-bust operation conducted by the Calamba City Police Station on August 24, 2013. The operation resulted in the recovery of two sachets of a white crystalline substance, which tested positive for methamphetamine hydrochloride, also known as shabu.

Proceedings in Lower Courts

The RTC, in its ruling dated March 31, 2016, convicted the accused-appellant of Illegal Sale of Dangerous Drugs, imposing a penalty of life imprisonment and a fine of PHP 500,000.00, while acquitting him of Illegal Possession due to insufficient evidence. The trial court upheld the integrity of the seized items, supported by the conduct of a buy-bust operation and the subsequent handling of the evidence.

Appeal and Court of Appeals Ruling

The accused-appellant's appeal to the CA resulted in an affirmation of the RTC's ruling on April 21, 2017. The CA concluded that the prosecution complied with the chain of custody requirements, relying on the testimonies of the police officers involved in the operation.

Legal Issue Presented

The primary legal issue to be resolved by the Supreme Court was whether the CA correctly upheld the conviction of the accused-appellant for Illegal Sale of Dangerous Drugs.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court granted the appeal, asserting that the prosecution failed to establish the integrity of the seized drugs. To maintain a conviction for Illegal Sale or Possession of Dangerous Drugs under RA 9165, it is necessary to demonstrate the identity of the drugs with moral certainty, as they constitute the corpus delicti of the crime.

Chain of Custody Requirements

The Court emphasized that strict compliance with the chain of custody procedure is essential. Marking, inventorying, and photographing the seized items must occur immediately following their seizure. The law necessitates that such procedures be executed in the presence of certain witnesses, including representatives from the media and the Department of Justice, to ensure transparency and prevent evidence tampering.

Procedural Deviations and Consequences

In this case, the inventory and photography of the seized drugs occurred without the required witnesses from the media and the DOJ. The testimonies from police of

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.