Title
People vs. Corpuz y Simon
Case
G.R. No. 175836
Decision Date
Jan 30, 2009
A stepfather convicted of six counts of simple rape against his minor stepdaughter; claims of consensual acts rejected; penalties and damages modified.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 175836)

Allegations and Charges

Ruben Corpuz y Simon faced six separate charges of rape against his stepdaughter, AAA, occurring between April and September 2002. The allegations indicated that during these months, while AAA's mother was out, the appellant would forcefully engage in sexual acts with her, using weapons for intimidation.

Proceedings and Testimonies

Upon arraignment, the appellant pleaded not guilty. During the trial, although the appellant admitted to sexual intercourse with AAA, he claimed that these interactions were consensual, asserting a "sweetheart" defense. The prosecution's star witness, AAA, testified that the appellant threatened her with a gun and a knife, making her comply with his advances. Medical evidence corroborated AAA's testimony regarding her injuries.

Trial Court Decision

On May 30, 2005, the Regional Trial Court found Corpuz guilty of six counts of qualified rape, imposing the death penalty for each count. The trial court held that the burden shifted to the appellant to demonstrate the absence of violence or intimidation, which he failed to do.

Appellate Court Review

Following an automatic review, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision but modified the charge to simple rape, citing errors in how the relationship between the appellant and AAA was articulated in the information. The appellate court consequently imposed a lesser penalty of reclusion perpetua and adjusted the financial penalties to AAA.

Issues of Credibility

The core of the case hinged on the credibility of witnesses, which is primarily assessed by the trial court. The appellate court noted that the trial judge was in a superior position to evaluate witness demeanor, thus preserving the trial court's original findings unless there was significant overlooked evidence.

Defense and its Burden of Proof

Ruben Corpuz's "sweetheart" theory was deemed an affirmative defense, requiring substantial supporting evidence, which he failed to provide beyond his own testimony. AAA’s straightforward response during cross-examination bolstered her credibility, highlighting her fear and lack of consent.

Legal Standards for Rape

The decision affirmed that moral ascendancy could substitute legal force in instances where the perpetrator held a familial relationship with the victim. The essential qualifiers for both rape and aggravated rape under Article 266-B of the Revised Penal Code require precise identification of both the victim's minority and the relationship to the offender in the charges, whic

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.