Title
People vs. Corpuz
Case
G.R. No. 101005
Decision Date
May 31, 1993
A 15-year-old girl was abducted at gunpoint and raped in 1989; the accused claimed consent, but the court upheld his conviction for forcible abduction with rape, affirming reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 101005)

Applicable Law

The case revolves around the complex crime of Forcible Abduction with Rape, specifically under Article 342 in relation to Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code.

Factual Background

On June 21, 1989, Mercy Amor Magallanes, accompanied by her mother, filed a criminal complaint against Ernesto G. Corpuz, detailing an incident of forcible abduction and subsequent rape. The court was informed that on June 19, 1989, Ms. Magallanes was forcibly taken at gunpoint by the accused while returning home from a friend's house. The accused allegedly coerced her into a motorized tricycle, threatening her life, and transported her to a secluded area where he perpetrated the crime.

Trial Proceedings

After the accused entered a plea of not guilty, trial proceedings commenced, where significant testimony was presented. The prosecution established its case primarily through the testimonies of the complainant and her mother, supported by accounts from law enforcement and a medical examination by a physician. The defense, however, produced its evidence through the accused and his witnesses, who contended that the interactions were consensual.

Trial Court's Findings

The trial court sided with the prosecution, finding Corpuz guilty as charged. It condemned the accused based on the nature of the threat against Ms. Magallanes, her testimony detailing the incident, and the lack of credible evidence supporting the defense's claims. The court emphasized that the absence of resistance from the victim did not negate the occurrence of rape, considering the intimidation employed by the accused.

Appellate Review and Arguments

Upon appeal, the defense argued that the prosecution's narrative was implausible and that there was insufficient evidence of rape as defined by law. They specifically challenged the interpretation of intimidation and the portrayal of consent, arguing inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony concerning her actions prior to the abduction.

Evaluation of Credibility

The appellate court upheld the trial court's judgment, asserting that it was in the best position to evaluate the witnesses' credibility. The court noted that the complainant's allegations were consistent and detailed, leading to the conclusion that the accused exerted sufficient intimidation to carry out the abduction and subsequent rape.

Legal Analysis of Intimidation and Consent

The appellate court clarified that intimidation need not be physical in nature; rather, it is sufficient if it instills a reasonable fear for one's safety, as demonstrated by the threat of death employed against Ms. Magallanes. The court rejected the defense's c

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.