Title
People vs. Cornel
Case
G.R. No. L-204
Decision Date
May 16, 1947
Gerardo Cornel assaulted Fabian Burac with a bolo, causing fatal injuries. Eyewitness testimony and medical evidence confirmed Cornel's guilt; his alibi was rejected. The Supreme Court upheld his homicide conviction.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-204)

Case Background and Charges

Cornel was sentenced to an indeterminate prison term ranging from 8 years and 1 day of prision mayor to 14 years, 8 months and 1 day of reclusion temporal, along with accessory penalties. He was also ordered to indemnify Burac's heirs in the amount of P2,000 and cover the associated costs. The appeal presented primarily questioned the sufficiency of the evidence related to Cornel's identity as the assailant.

Evidence and Witness Testimony

The core of the prosecution's case rested on the eyewitness testimony of Trinidad Coral, who observed Cornel assaulting Burac with a bolo as Burac descended his stairs on June 8, 1945. Coral testified that after wounding Burac, Cornel threw a stone that struck Burac's clavicle and then fled toward his residence. The trial court accorded full credibility to Coral's account, emphasizing her familiarity with the appellant, which countered Cornel’s conjecture regarding potential misidentification.

Identity of the Assailant

The identification of Cornel was further corroborated by an additional witness, Caspara Bendicio, who reportedly received a declaration from Burac shortly after the attack, wherein Burac attributed his injuries to Cornel. Despite Cornel's assertion that this testimony was inadmissible, it was upheld by the trial court under the res gestae principle, further solidifying Cornel's identity as the perpetrator.

Forensic Evidence and Medical Testimony

Cornel's defense sought to challenge the nature of Burac’s injuries based on the medical testimony provided by Dr. Mariano Cruel. Dr. Cruel described an incised vertical wound on Burac's forehead, attributing it to a bolo or similar weapon. Cornel contended that the wound could have been caused by a hard irregular object, which, though theoretically plausible, lacked sufficient evidential support when weighed against eyewitness accounts.

Establishment of Death

The prosecution successfully established that Burac had indeed died as a result of tetanus stemming from the inflicted wounds. Testimony from Burac's wife and mother-in-law supported this claim, which was substantiated by Dr. Cruel's examination notes detailing the symptoms indicative of tetanus. The absence of a registration record with the civil registrar did not undermine the established fact of Burac’s death, as it merely indicated a lapse in documentation at that time.

Natural Consequences of the Act

The court concluded that Cornel must be held accountable for the direct consequences of his unlawful actions. It referenced previous jurisprudence (People vs. Borbano) emphasizing the liability that arises from the perpetration of a crim

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.