Title
People vs. Constancio y Bacungay
Case
G.R. No. 206226
Decision Date
Apr 4, 2016
Accused abducted, raped, and killed victim; witnesses and Berry’s confession proved guilt; Supreme Court upheld conviction for Rape with Homicide.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 206226)

Factual Background

On the night of March 11, 2001, Constancio and Berry, along with other co-accused, forcibly abducted "AAA" outside the Alabang Town Center. The Information filed against them detailed the unlawful acts, including rape and murder, asserting that the accused attacked and strangled "AAA," resulting in her death. Berry and Constancio pleaded not guilty during their arraignment on May 3, 2001.

Prosecution's Evidence

The prosecution’s case relied on witness testimonies which included the victim's mother, "BBB," who recounted the events leading to her daughter's abduction, rape, and murder. Other witnesses included classmates of "AAA," who provided time-stamped accounts of their last interactions with her. Forensic evidence was presented by Dr. Emmanuel Reyes, who established the cause of death as asphyxia due to strangulation, and additional testimonies highlighted the actions of the appellants before and after the crime.

Defense's Case

The defense raised alibi as the basis for acquittal, asserting that Berry was not involved in the crime despite his confession, which he claimed was coerced. Constancio maintained that he was in a different location during the events in question, suggesting he was wrongly implicated. Testimonies from the defense witnesses attempted to discredit the prosecution's narrative, but were not sufficient to dismantle the strong corroborative evidence presented against the accused.

Ruling of the Regional Trial Court

On January 23, 2007, the Regional Trial Court (RTC) found Constancio and Berry guilty beyond reasonable doubt of Rape with Homicide, sentencing them to reclusion perpetua and ordering them to jointly pay damages to the heirs of "AAA." The acquittal of co-accused Pagkalinawan was also pronounced due to lack of evidence linking him directly to the crime.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals

On February 24, 2012, the Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision, concluding that the appellants conspired to commit the crime and that the testimonies provided by eyewitnesses were credible. The appellate court considered Berry's extrajudicial confession as admissible evidence and supportive of the prosecution’s allegations against both him and Constancio. This ruling was based on the circumstantial evidence present in the case, which linked both accused to the commission of the crime.

Key Legal Issues Raised on Appeal

The appellants raised several issues on appeal, notably questioning the credibility of prosecution witnesses as well as the admissibility of Berry's extrajudicial confession. They argued that the testimonies should not have been relied upon due to alleged incons

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.