Title
People vs. Colana y Avaricio
Case
G.R. No. L-62617-18
Decision Date
Nov 28, 1983
Fraternity members Leonardo Colana and Jorge Magabilen fatally stabbed Librado de la Vega in a revenge-driven attack. Colana's confession was deemed admissible, corroborated by evidence, leading to his murder conviction affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-62617-18)

Incident Overview

On the evening of August 6, 1979, Colana, Magabilen, and others waited at the corner of Claro M. Recto Avenue and Oroquieta Street for members of the Alpha fraternity. Upon identifying de la Vega, Magabilen seized him, while Colana assaulted him with an icepick. De la Vega was outnumbered and sustained multiple stab wounds that ultimately led to his death from internal hemorrhage.

Motive and Background

The motivation behind the attack was described as revenge, stemming from an earlier incident where members of the Phi Lambda Epsilon fraternity were beaten by associates of the Alpha fraternity. During trial proceedings, both Colana and Magabilen denied their involvement in the crime, with Colana disavowing his initial confession, claiming he was not involved in the killing, and attributing the acts to Bravo and Caneda.

Extrajudicial Confession and Its Admissibility

A critical aspect of the case involved the admissibility of Colana's extrajudicial confession, made after his arrest on September 19, 1979. The confession was taken by Patrolman Reynaldo H. Jaylo and included a detailed acknowledgment of Colana's rights under the Constitution. The confession was signed by Colana and corroborated by physical evidence linking him to the crime, including the icepick identified in his confession.

Evidence and Testimony

The coroner's report indicated that the victim had suffered several punctured wounds, consistent with an icepick's use. Despite the defense's plea of mistaken identity for de la Vega as he was not a member of the rival fraternity, Bravo's testimony aligned with Colana's confession and established a clear narrative of Colana’s involvement. The confession and witness corroboration provided sufficient evidence to satisfy the prosecution's burden of proof.

Legal Findings and Conclusion

The court upheld that Colana voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his rights during police interrogation. The evidence demonstrated his guilt was established beyond reasonable doubt. The c

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.