Title
People vs. Cercado y Mozada
Case
G.R. No. 144494
Decision Date
Jul 26, 2002
Appellant convicted for selling 1kg of marijuana in a buy-bust operation; defense of frame-up rejected; reclusion perpetua and P1M fine upheld.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 144494)

Charges and Penalty

Ferdinand Cercado was charged with violating Section 4, Article II of Republic Act No. 6425, as amended by Republic Act No. 7659, specifically for the illegal sale of one kilogram of marijuana. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) convicted him and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua and a fine of P1,000,000.00.

Facts of the Case

On the day of the incident, PO2 Edgar C. Torres, acting as a poseur-buyer, received information from a civilian informant that an individual known as "Alyas Imoka" (Cercado) was selling marijuana. A buy-bust operation was conducted where PO2 Torres, along with other officers, went to Cercado's house. After a wait of approximately four hours, Cercado delivered the marijuana and received the boodle money. Following a pre-arranged signal, police officers arrested Cercado and recovered both the marijuana and the boodle money.

Testimonies of Prosecution Witnesses

The prosecution presented testimonies from several police officers. PO2 Torres detailed the operation and confirmed the sale of marijuana. PO2 Teogenes N. Perez corroborated Torres' account of events, while P/Supt. Theresa Ann Bugayong-Cid conducted a forensic examination that confirmed the substance was marijuana. P/Sr. Inspector Christopher N. Abrahano also supported the testimonies, reinforcing that they recognized and arrested the accused immediately after the transaction.

Defense's Argument

Cercado testified that he was at home on the night of the incident when unidentified men forcibly entered his house, searched for marijuana, and later brought him outside where he was coerced into admitting possession. During cross-examination, he claimed the marijuana was planted by law enforcement.

Assigned Errors and Appeals

Cercado appealed the decision, raising two main issues: first, challenging the credibility of the prosecution's witnesses, asserting that the lack of presentation of the informant weakened the case; second, claiming that the prosecution failed to prove he had no legal authority to sell drugs.

Ruling and Legal Analysis

The appellate court affirmed the decision of the RTC, ruling that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses were credible and reliable. It emphasized that the absence of the confidential informant did not invalidate the transaction evidence presented. The prosecution sufficiently established that a sale took place, and Cercado's arguments concerning reasonable doubt were dismissed.

On the issue of legal authority to sell mari

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.