Title
People vs. Cayabyab
Case
G.R. No. 167147
Decision Date
Aug 3, 2005
A six-year-old girl was raped by a family acquaintance; medical evidence and credible testimony led to the perpetrator's conviction and death penalty.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 167147)

Factual Background

On August 7, 2001, Genaro Cayabyab y Fernandez committed rape against six-year-old Alpha Jane Bertiz while she was at home taking care of her younger siblings. During the incident, which occurred when her mother had stepped out to buy kerosene, the appellant approached Alpha Jane under the pretense of teaching her arithmetic. When she refused to comply, he assaulted her, subsequently using tear gas before fleeing the scene. Metchie, Alpha Jane's mother, was informed of the incident by her daughter and promptly reported it to local authorities.

Legal Proceedings

Following the incident, Alpha Jane underwent a series of medical examinations, which confirmed the presence of injuries consistent with sexual assault. On August 10, 2001, the appellant was formally charged with rape. In his defense, the appellant claimed an alibi, asserting that he was working as a tricycle driver on the said date and was arrested at home upon returning later that evening. Despite his denials, the trial court found his defense unconvincing and determined that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses corroborated each other effectively.

Trial Court’s Findings

The trial court found Genaro Cayabyab guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime of rape. It considered the victim's age as a qualifying circumstance under Article 266-B of the Revised Penal Code, resulting in the death penalty being imposed. The decision emphasized that the credibility and testimony of the minor victim, which aligned with medical findings, outweighed the appellant's unsubstantiated assertions.

Appeal and Affirmation of Conviction

The case was elevated to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court's decision in its entirety. The appellate court concurred with the lower court’s findings, reinforcing the absence of credible evidence that could dispute the testimony provided by Alpha Jane.

Review of Evidence and Legal Standards

Upon review, the Supreme Court found no justifiable basis to overturn the lower courts' findings. It highlighted the importance of the trial court’s ability to observe the demeanor and reliability of witnesses firsthand. Alpha Jane articulated a clear and consistent narrative identifying the appellant as her assailant, further supported by the medical examination reports indicating blunt force trauma consistent with sexual assault.

Legal Rulings on Minor Victims

The Supreme Court stated that the prosecution had sufficiently established the victim’s age, supported not only by testimonies but also by a birth certificate presented in court. The court noted that both the trial court and the appellant acknowledged the authenticity of thi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.