Title
People vs. Casta y Carolino
Case
G.R. No. 172871
Decision Date
Sep 16, 2008
Appellant convicted of murder for stabbing victim from behind; self-defense rejected, treachery upheld; voluntary surrender mitigated penalty; damages awarded.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 172871)

Antecedent Facts

Clemente Casta was charged with murder for the fatal stabbing of Danilo Camba. The prosecution's Information detailed that on the afternoon of August 20, 1989, Casta, with intent to kill and by means of treachery, attacked Camba with a knife, inflicting fatal wounds. Casta pleaded not guilty during his arraignment.

Testimonies and Evidence

Various witnesses testified against Casta, including Marlyn Cister, who observed Casta stab Camba from behind as Camba stood roadside, and Modesto Cardona, who corroborated her account. Domingo Camba, a police officer, described the investigation that followed. Casta, in his defense, claimed he acted in self-defense but failed to establish any unlawful aggression from Camba.

Trial Court Ruling

On August 18, 1999, the Regional Trial Court convicted Casta of murder, imposing a sentence of reclusion perpetua and ordering him to pay damages to the heirs of the victim, namely P50,000 for death indemnity, P100,000 for moral and exemplary damages, and P13,000 for actual damages.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals upheld the trial court's decision on March 10, 2006. Casta appealed, arguing the trial court's errors in conviction and penalty.

The Court's Ruling on Appeal

The Supreme Court conducted a thorough review of the lower court's factual findings, which are generally given deference. Casta's admission of stabbing Camba was pivotal, indicating a lack of credible self-defense claims. The prosecution successfully proved beyond reasonable doubt that Casta committed murder with the qualifying circumstance of treachery, given the sudden and surprise nature of the attack, depriving Camba of any opportunity for self-defense.

Self-Defense Argument

Casta's assertion of self-defense was rejected. The essential elements of self-defense under Article 11 of the Revised Penal Code were not established. Casta failed to provide corroborating evidence for his claim of unlawful aggression from Camba, while eyewitness accounts contradicted his version of events.

Mitigating Circumstances and Voluntary Surrender

Despite the findings of guilt, the Court recognized Casta's voluntary surrender to the police, which serves as a mitigating circumstance. His surrender, occurring within a day after the incident, reflected an acknowledgment of guilt and resulted in a modification of his sentence.

Appropriate Penalty

The Court clarified that the crime of murder occurred in 1989, prior to the amendments introduced by Republic Act No. 7659, which imposes a heavier penalty. Therefore, Casta's sentence needed to align with the legal framework in place at the time of the offense. Casta was sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of 10 years and 1 day of prision mayor maximum as t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.