Title
People vs. Carlit y Gawat
Case
G.R. No. 227309
Decision Date
Aug 16, 2017
Appeal granted; Carlit acquitted due to broken chain of custody and procedural lapses in buy-bust operation under R.A. 9165.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 227309)

Nature of the Case

The present appeal pertains to the decision rendered by the Court of Appeals (CA) on August 20, 2015, which upheld the conviction of Carlit for the illegal sale of dangerous drugs. The accused seeks to overturn this ruling based on claims of unlawful arrest and issues regarding the chain of custody of the seized substance.

Facts of the Case

The facts material to this case reveal that PO3 Christian Carvajal was the assigned poseur-buyer in a buy-bust operation set up against Carlit on February 26, 2011. Following a tip-off regarding Carlit's illegal activities, the operation was organized. During the operation, Carvajal purchased shabu from Carlit in exchange for marked buy-bust money. After the transaction, Carvajal identified himself and arrested Carlit, seizing the substance and the buy-bust money. The seized substance, later confirmed to be shabu by PSI Myrna Malojo, was subjected to laboratory testing and established as evidence.

Procedural History

An information was filed against Carlit, charging her with illegal sale of dangerous drugs, which was subsequently tried at the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Dagupan City. Upon arraignment, Carlit pleaded not guilty. The prosecution presented two witnesses—PSI Malojo and PO3 Carvajal—who testified regarding the identity and analysis of the seized substance. Carlit, on the other hand, claimed she was wrongfully arrested and maintained her innocence regarding the drug transaction.

Ruling of the RTC

The RTC ruled in favor of the prosecution, asserting that Carlit was caught in the act of selling illegal drugs, thus finding her guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Carlit was sentenced to life imprisonment and ordered to pay a fine, prompting her to appeal the decision to the CA.

Ruling of the CA

The CA affirmed the RTC's decision, asserting that the evidence presented sufficiently established Carlit's guilt and that the prosecution's case was compelling. Carlit's appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.

Issue for Review

The primary issue in the appeal is whether the prosecution successfully established all essential links in the chain of custody necessary for a conviction concerning the illegal sale of dangerous drugs.

Court's Ruling

In reviewing the case, the Supreme Court found that the prosecution failed to prove all elements required for a conviction under Section 5 of R.A. 9165. The Court elucidated the critical importance of establishing a complete chain of custody for evidence in drug cases, stating that the integrity and identity of the seized substance must be preserved. It underscored that failure to present every link in the chain, particularly the evidence custodian PO2 Manuel, resulted in reasonable doubt regarding the integrity of the evidence presented.

Chain of Custody Analysis

The Court emphasized the need for strict adherence to proced

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.