Title
People vs. Cantuba y Deblois
Case
G.R. No. 137454
Decision Date
Nov 18, 2002
A 5-year-old girl was sexually assaulted by a neighbor, leading to a rape conviction. The Supreme Court upheld the verdict but reduced the penalty to reclusion perpetua due to insufficient proof of the victim's age.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 208213)

Facts of the Case

On the afternoon of June 10, 1997, Jennifer returned home limping and holding her private part. Her mother, Belinda Lampas, discovered that Jennifer's panty was bloodied. After dressing her child, Jennifer recounted that the neighbor, referred to as Kuya Jerry, had taken her to his sister's house, undressed her, and sexually assaulted her. Medical examination by Dr. Manuel Reyes confirmed injuries consistent with sexual intercourse, leading to the eventual filing of a rape complaint against Cantuba by Jennifer.

Proceedings and Trial

Following the alleged incident, Belinda reported the matter to local authorities, which led to Jennifer undergoing a medical examination. The prosecution presented significant evidence, including Jennifer's testimony, the medical findings, and psych evaluations suggesting trauma and depression as a result of the abuse. In contrast, Cantuba provided an alibi stating he was assisting a neighbor at the time of the incident, which he corroborated through witness accounts.

Defense and Counterarguments

Cantuba's defense rested on claims of mistaken identity and a lack of evidence regarding the crime's occurrence in a populated area. He suggested another neighbor named Jerry Teves as the actual perpetrator complicating the identification. Despite evidence supporting his alibi, inconsistencies emerged when cross-examined witnesses contradicted parts of his account.

Trial Court Judgment

On January 13, 1999, the Quezon City Regional Trial Court found Cantuba guilty of rape, imposing the death penalty and awarding damages to the victim. Cantuba appealed, asserting errors in the trial court's decision regarding his conviction and the imposition of the death penalty.

Appellate Court Findings

The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s decision, holding that Jennifer's testimony was credible and consistent, warranting full faith and credence. The court rejected Cantuba's claims of mistaken identity and reinforced that even in populated areas, rapes may occur without witnesses.

Guidelines on Proving Age in Rape Cases

While addressing the imposition of the death penalty, the court considered the need to prove Jennifer's age accurately. Based on precedents, evidence su

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.