Title
People vs. Canete
Case
G.R. No. 138400
Decision Date
Jul 11, 2002
Sergio Cañete, detained in a riot, was acquitted of parricide due to insufficient evidence, inconsistent testimonies, and excessive police force, upholding the presumption of innocence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 138400)

Facts of the Case

On June 1, 1997, at approximately 9:30 AM, the CaAete family staged a riot in the jail during a transfer attempt to the Cebu Provincial Jail. The altercation escalated into violence, resulting in the police deploying tear gas and water cannons to control the situation. Amid these events, Sergio allegedly struck his father, Sotero, with a wooden bunk leg which led to fatal injuries.

Prosecution's Version

The prosecution contended that Sergio CaAete, during the melee in the jail, intentionally struck his father, resulting in a fatal head injury. Testimony from law enforcement indicated that the police had to use force to manage the situation when the inmates resisted transfer. Following the incident, Sotero was transported to the hospital but succumbed to his injuries soon after.

Defense’s Argument

Sergio CaAete presented a conflicting narrative, claiming that police officer PO3 Ricardo Enriquez was responsible for his father’s fatal injuries. He asserted that he and his father were compliant when police engaged them, projecting that the violence was initiated by law enforcement rather than by him.

Procedural History

Sergio was arraigned and pleaded not guilty to the charge of parricide. The Regional Trial Court subsequently found him guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua. Sergio appealed this ruling, arguing that the trial court erred in its findings.

Evaluation of Evidence

The court emphasized the need for evidence to be evaluated under a strict standard. The testimonies from prosecution witnesses were scrutinized, as they did not present sufficient evidence to corroborate the events as described. Specifically, the lack of medical documentation related to the alleged assault on police by the accused raised doubts about the credibility of the witnesses.

Key Findings of the Court

The court highlighted several key inconsistencies in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses:

  1. The absence of physical evidence such as the purported weapon used in the assault on Enriquez.
  2. The injuries sustained by Sergio were not addressed by the prosecution, which further undermined their claims of his aggressiveness.
  3. The circumstances under which Soto and Sergio were allegedly able t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.