Title
People vs. Canastre
Case
G.R. No. L-2055
Decision Date
Dec 24, 1948
Eduardo Canastre convicted of robbery with rape after breaking into a home, assaulting Benedicta Beri, and stealing goods; alibi defense rejected, indemnity awarded.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-2055)

Factual Background of the Incident

The events transpired on June 28, 1946, when Canastre, Sayuco, and two other unidentified individuals intruded into the home of Magdaleno Beri. Armed with a gun, Canastre threatened Beri and subsequently abducted his daughter Benedicta. The assailants forcibly took Benedicta outside to a mango tree, where they sexually assaulted her despite her resistance and cries for help. Following the assault, Canastre and Sayuco stole several items from the Beri household.

Legal Proceedings and Trial Outcome

Following the trial, Canastre and Sayuco were convicted of robbery with rape, while Pasaporte and Fabilona were acquitted. Canastre received an indeterminate sentence ranging from 10 years and 1 day of prision mayor to 17 years and 1 day of reclusion temporal, while Sayuco faced a sentence of 17 years and 1 day to 20 years of reclusion temporal. Canastre subsequently appealed the conviction.

Defense Arguments and Issues Raised

Canastre's defense primarily hinged on an alibi that he was home due to illness, asserting that no credible witness could link him to the crime. The defense further attempted to cast doubt on the prosecution's case by highlighting the failure to identify his co-accused fully, which led to their acquittal. This argument aimed to suggest potential inconsistencies in the testimonies provided by the prosecution’s witnesses.

Prosecution's Evidence and the Court's Assessment

The prosecution, however, provided compelling evidence, including a statement from Dr. Engracio Parrenas, the district health officer, who testified that Benedicta had reported being raped by four men. The court noted that the lack of physical evidence of violence did not disprove the occurrence of sexual intercourse, as verbal testimony from the victim and her identification of Canastre held significant weight. The court determined that the testimony provided by the prosecution witnesses was credible and compelling enough to establish Canastre's involvement in the crime without reasonable doubt.

Conclusion

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.