Title
People vs. Calvelo y Consada
Case
G.R. No. 223526
Decision Date
Dec 6, 2017
Ariel Calvelo was convicted for selling shabu in a buy-bust operation. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, ruling that the prosecution proved the illegal sale, preserved the chain of custody, and found no evidence of police irregularities.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 223526)

Factual Background

Ariel was accused of selling three heat-sealed plastic sachets containing a total of 14.07 grams of Methamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu) to a poseur buyer, Police Officer 2 Marites T. Villanueva, during a buy-bust operation facilitated by a confidential informant. The transaction allegedly took place at approximately 11:00 p.m. on November 26, 2005, in exchange for two marked five-hundred-peso bills. Upon conducting the operation, the police apprehended Ariel and recovered the marked money along with the illegal drugs shortly after the transaction was deemed consummated.

Prosecution's Version

The prosecution presented key testimonies from Villanueva and her partner, SPO2 Gerry Abalos, who described the buy-bust operation in detail. The prosecution followed proper protocols for surveillance, marking, and seizing the drugs, with Villanueva positively identifying Ariel during the sale and handover of the drugs. The drugs were subsequently turned over to the forensic laboratory, where they were confirmed to contain shabu.

Defense's Version

Ariel contended that he was falsely accused, asserting that he was at the Traveller's Inn purchasing food for his brother at the time of his arrest. He claimed the police officers used excessive force during his apprehension and maintained that his arrest was unlawful. Moreover, he asserted that the prosecution failed to present the informant, whose involvement would have clarified the events.

Ruling of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)

The RTC found Ariel guilty beyond reasonable doubt, sentencing him to life imprisonment and imposing a fine of one million pesos. The RTC ruled that the prosecution established a clear chain of custody and that the drugs presented in court matched those seized from Ariel during the buy-bust operation.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals (CA)

The CA affirmed the RTC's decision, concluding that the prosecution sufficiently proved Ariel's identity as the seller and substantiated the illegal sale of drugs. The Court emphasized that Villanueva's testimony was credible and that the absence of the informant did not nullify the prosecution's case, as Villanueva had firsthand knowledge of the transaction.

Legal Issues

Ariel raised three major issues on appeal: 1) whether the RTC erred in relying on the prosecution’s version despite alleged irregularities in the buy-bust operation; 2) whether the prosecution failed to establish the identity and integrity of the alleged confiscated drugs; and 3) whether due process was upheld in finding him guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court dismissed Ariel's appeal, asserting that the prosecu

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.