Title
People vs. Caliso
Case
G.R. No. 131475-76
Decision Date
Oct 14, 2002
Marcelo Caliso convicted of raping his daughter, AAA, in 1993 and 1994. Supreme Court upheld convictions but reduced death penalty to reclusion perpetua due to procedural error.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 131475-76)

Case Background

On September 13, 1994, the RTC received two separate informations charging Marcelo Caliso with rape. The first incident (Criminal Case No. 716) occurred around July 1993 when AAA was 14 years old, and the second incident (Criminal Case No. 717) took place on February 15, 1994. During the trial, AAA testified about the traumatic experiences she endured at the hands of her father, recounting the threats and violence he used to coerce her into submission.

Prosecution's Narrative

The prosecution's case was built on AAA's testimony, detailing how her father used a bolo to intimidate her, resulting in forced sexual acts. On the first occasion, AAA described being alone with Caliso when he attacked her in their home. Following the incident, she reported physical injury and trauma, corroborated by a medical examination which revealed healed lacerations in her hymen, suggesting penetration had occurred.

Moreover, during the second incident, AAA was coerced into a hut where her father again raped her, threatening her life to ensure her silence. Following these assaults, AAA fled with her siblings to their mother’s sister and subsequently sought legal action against Caliso.

Defense

Caliso denied the charges, claiming AAA was lying and attempted to depict her as a morally loose individual. He presented a narrative of other circumstances that he argued demonstrated her lack of credibility, including discussions about her attending dance parties. He alleged that her motive for bringing forth the charges was rooted in his refusal to sell their family home.

Court's Findings

The trial court rendered its decision on September 10, 1997, convicting Marcelo Caliso of two counts of rape. He was sentenced to death for one count and to reclusion perpetua for the other. The court emphasized that the testimony of AAA, coupled with the medical evidence and the context of familial authority, rendered her assertions credible despite the defense's attempts to undermine her character and motive.

Legal Reasoning

The decision referenced Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code, which outlines the parameters of rape, namely, achieving carnal knowledge through force or intimidation. The court noted that the testimony of a single credible victim is sufficient for conviction, particularly in sensitive matters such as incest, where corroborating witnesses are typically absent.

The court dismissed Caliso’s arguments regarding the delay in reporting the incidents and the necessity of exact dates, highlighting that the essence of the crime was the violation itself rather than the specifics of time and place. Furthermore, the credibility of AAA's testimony was heightened by her lack of motive to fabricate such grave allegations against her father.

Modifications and Conclusions

While the court upheld the conviction for the crimes as charged in Criminal Case Nos. 716 and 717, it noted a procedu

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.