Title
People vs. Cajara
Case
G.R. No. 122498
Decision Date
Sep 27, 2000
Accused convicted of simple rape, sentenced to life imprisonment & ordered to pay damages, victim’s testimony deemed credible.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 122498)

Allegations and Events of the Crime

The Information presented alleged that Cajara, who is related to Cajote as her brother-in-law, employed force and intimidation to gain carnal knowledge of her against her will. On the night of the incident, Marita, then 16 years old, was sleeping with Cajara, his common-law wife Merly Tagana, and their children in a single-room house. Around 2 a.m., Marita was awakened by Cajara, who restrained her and threatened her life with a bolo. Despite her vocal protests, Cajara proceeded to assault her, ultimately completing the act of sexual violence while Merly and the children were present but did not intervene effectively.

Aftermath and Reporting the Crime

After the assault, Marita fled to seek help. She initially confided in her sisters, who advised against filing a complaint due to fears of retribution from Cajara, known in the community for past violent acts. A barangay official, despite being aware of the situation, echoed the caution against reporting. Ultimately, Marita reported the incident to the police, leading to a medical examination that confirmed signs consistent with sexual assault.

Defense and Trial Proceedings

During the trial, Cajara denied the allegations, asserted an alibi, and claimed that Marita's half-sister, Merly, supported his case. Merly claimed that if Marita was indeed assaulted, it would not be her husband's fault. The trial court found Cajara guilty based on credible testimony from Marita, despite the defense's arguments suggesting bias and the credibility of the common-law wife's testimony.

Legal Findings and Conviction

The trial court convicted Cajara of rape under Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code, invoking aggravating circumstances including the victim's age, familial relationship, and the act being committed in the presence of relatives.

Appeal and Modification of Conviction

On appeal, significant arguments arose regarding whether the elements necessary for Qualified Rape were adequately pleaded in the Information. The court noted that while the relationship by affinity was alleged, the lack of legal marriage between Cajara and Merly negated that qualification. Furthermore, the specific circumstance of the crime being committed in view of relatives was not included in the charges, leading to an erroneous conviction for Qualified Rape rather than Simple Rape.

Application of Law and Conclusion

The 1987 Philippine Constitution guarantees the right

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.