Title
People vs. Cagadas, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 88044
Decision Date
Jan 23, 1991
Rex Ballena was abducted, murdered, and robbed by ICHDF members in 1973; accused convicted based on credible circumstantial evidence, affirmed by Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 88044)

Applicable Law

The pertinent statutory provision is Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code concerning murder, which outlines the parameters for prosecution in cases involving premeditation and treachery, along with the aggravating factors that may apply due to the use of public office in the commission of the crime.

Sequence of Events

Rex Ballena and his sister, Lucia Ballena-Tabo, traveled to Tagum to withdraw money for laborers. Upon returning, Lucia was informed that her brother was missing. Subsequently, on June 9, 1983, Lucia sought assistance in searching for Rex, encountering ICHDF members, including the accused, who dissuaded them from continuing the search. Rex's decomposed body was found on June 10, revealing signs of violent death, including stab wounds and binding indicative of a gruesome murder.

Charges and Accusations

On November 8, 1984, an information for murder was filed against the ICHDF members. With corroborating eyewitness accounts, the amended information highlighted that the accused conspired and executed the act of murder through treachery, taking advantage of their public positions.

Trial and Evidence

The trial involved testimonies from five prosecution witnesses, including Jose and Ramos Magunot, who recounted witnessing Rex being led, bound and gagged, by the accused. The defense, comprising testimonies from thirteen witnesses, attempted to establish an alibi, claiming the accused were at other locations. However, the trial court deeply scrutinized the alibi defense, emphasizing that such claims often lack substantiation.

Trial Court’s Ruling

The Regional Trial Court found the accused guilty of murder, sentencing them to reclusion perpetua. The court determined that the prosecution successfully established guilt through circumstantial evidence. Witness testimonies were considered credible due to their disinterestedness, and the court dismissed the defense's claims of improbable motivations or circumstances.

Appellate Review and Findings

In their appeal, the appellants raised multiple points of error including the alleged failure of the prosecution to prove guilt and improper reliance on circumstantial evidence. However, the appellate court upheld the lower court&

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.