Title
People vs. Cabrera
Case
G.R. No. L-17748
Decision Date
Mar 4, 1922
In 1920, Constabulary soldiers, seeking revenge for a comrade's death, attacked Manila police, killing several. Convicted of sedition, their confessions were deemed voluntary, proving conspiracy under Act No. 292.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-17748)

Uprising and Resulting Violence

On the evening of December 15, under orders from Corporal Ingles and with the assistance of Private Torio, soldiers sawed through barracks window bars, armed themselves, and attacked multiple police posts across Intramuros. The volley on Calle Real killed Policeman Driskill and his companion Jacumin, and struck civilians aboard a passing streetcar. Subsequent attacks claimed the lives of Captain Wichman, Policeman Saplala, Patrolmen Trogue and Sison, and Sergeant Policarpio; several others were wounded.

Investigation and Confessions

On December 16, 1920, Colonel Sweet assembled 180 soldiers, separated them by company, and invited those involved to step forward. Seventy-seven admitted participation and provided written statements (Exhibits C–C-76), taken in English or Spanish and, when requested, translated into Tagalog or local dialects. Each soldier signed under oath that the declarations were free and voluntary, without promise of immunity.

Trial and Procedural Posture

Defendants were charged separately with sedition (violating Act No. 292) and with murder/serious physical injuries. All but eight initially pleaded guilty to sedition but later entered not guilty pleas. The prosecution relied on the seventy-seven confessions and eyewitness testimony. Defenses challenged the voluntariness of the confessions and, as to certain defendants, disputed their participation in the riot.

Legal Issues on Appeal

  1. Admissibility of Confessions: Whether Exhibits C–C-76 were obtained by coercion, misunderstanding, or promise of transfer to Mindanao.
  2. Existence of Conspiracy: Whether the soldiers acted under a common design or merely as automatons influenced by group psychology.
  3. Violation of the Treason and Sedition Law: Whether the uprising constituted sedition under section 5(3) of Act No. 292.

Analysis of Confessions

Under the Administrative Code and established jurisprudence, a confession is admissible if made freely, voluntarily, and without inducement. The Court found no evidence of violence or promises; interpreters ensured comprehension; and in open court, the majority reaffirmed their admissions. The soldiers’ military experience further supports the reliability of their statements.

Conspiracy and Joint Liability

Even absent express agreement, joint participation in a public, armed attack to avenge a perceived wrong implies a common criminal design. Each defendant shared the motive (revenge against police), the method (coordinated volleys from multiple positions), and benefited from mutual assistance, establishing conspiracy by inference from their collective acts.

Sedition under Act No. 292

Section 5(3) penalizes public and tumultuous uprisings to inflic

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.