Title
People vs. Cabrera
Case
G.R. No. 105992
Decision Date
Feb 1, 1995
Rolando Cabrera convicted of double homicide for the 1989 killing of the Lim spouses; circumstantial evidence and conspiracy established guilt, penalty modified to indeterminate sentence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 105992)

Incident Details

On August 27, 1989, the victims were attacked in their bedroom during the early morning hours. Glerissa heard knocking at the door and, upon opening it, encountered the three accused whom she recognized. Armed with iron bars, they forcibly pulled her out of the room, locked the door, and subsequently attacked the Lim spouses, causing their deaths. Evidence suggests robbery was the motive, with cash and jewelry stolen from the victims' residence.

Trial and Charges

The Regional Trial Court of Kalookan City charged the accused with robbery with double homicide under Criminal Case No. C-33866. The prosecution's main evidence came from Glerissa, whose testimony outlined the sequence of events leading to the victims’ deaths.

Accused's Defense

Rolando Cabrera, the accused-appellant, denied participation, claiming he was coerced by his co-accused under threat of violence. He asserted that he did not share a motive for the crime unlike his co-accused, who had been cursed by the victims over a salary issue. Cabrera contended that he did not have the opportunity to report the crime due to fear and allegedly being monitored by his accomplices.

Circumstantial Evidence and Conspiracy

The appellate court noted the reliance on circumstantial evidence, as no witness directly observed the crime. The court held that circumstantial evidence, when considered collectively, established the guilt of Cabrera. The conspiracy was inferred from the coordinated actions of all three accused before, during, and after the commission of the crime. The trial court's determination that a conspiracy existed was upheld, indicating that the actions of the accused sufficed to demonstrate their collective criminal intent.

Witness Credibility and Conduct

The court found Glerissa's testimony credible despite her fear-induced actions during the incident. Her age and vulnerability were taken into account, suggesting that her response was consistent with someone under threat. The presence of the two steel bars further corroborated the prosecution's case.

Sentencing and Legal Considerations

The trial court convicted Cabrera of double homicide and imposed a penalty of reclusion perpetua. However, the appellate court modified this sentence, stating that the crime did not warrant such a severe penalty under the Revised Penal Code. The court reasoned that since homicide does not equat

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.