Title
People vs. Cabote
Case
G.R. No. 136143
Decision Date
Nov 15, 2001
Accused, motivated by jealousy, killed victim with a scythe in a sudden, treacherous attack. Conviction upheld based on credible lone witness testimony; treachery proven, premeditation not.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 9684)

Charges and Information Filed

On June 4, 1996, an information was filed against Agapito Cabote for the crime of murder, alleging that he attacked Ramil Tero with evident premeditation and treachery, resulting in Tero's death. The accusations specified that Cabote was armed with a scythe, intending to kill Tero.

Evidence Presented by the Prosecution

The prosecution’s case relied heavily on the testimony of Florentino Avenido who detailed witnessing events leading to Tero's death. Avenido, who had escaped from detention, claimed that Cabote threatened Tero for visiting Jessa Ramos, a woman both men were competing for. Avenido saw Cabote approach Tero later that night and, shortly thereafter, witnessed the accused hack Tero with a scythe.

Medical Examination and Cause of Death

Dr. Maria Rena Rimando, the Municipal Health Officer, testified regarding the forensic aspects of Tero's death. She reported that Tero sustained multiple wounds, indicating a violent attack with a sharp object, leading to his death from shock due to the injuries.

Defense Testimony

In his defense, Agapito Cabote testified that he was at home caring for his sick child at the time of Tero’s death. He accused Avenido of fabricating the story, claiming that when Avenido sought refuge at his home later that night, he appeared with bloodstains and a scythe. Cabote’s wife, Elena, corroborated his account, stating that Avenido had approached their home bloodied and admitted to killing Tero.

Trial Court Proceedings and Conviction

The trial court sided with the prosecution, finding Cabote guilty of murder based on Avenido’s credible testimony, notwithstanding the absence of corroborating evidence from additional witnesses. The court emphasized the nature of the attack as treacherous and sentenced Cabote to reclusion perpetua, along with a monetary indemnity to Tero's heirs.

Appeal and Appellant's Arguments

Cabote appealed the conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in trusting the testimony of Avenido, claiming it was uncorroborated. Despite this, the appellate court held that a lone eyewitness’s testimony can be sufficient for conviction if deemed credible.

Assessment of Credibility and Testimony

The appellate court emphasized the trial court’s unique position in assessing witness credibility, affirming its findings due to Avenido’s detailed and straightforward account of the events. Concerns raised by Cabote regarding inconsistencies in Avenido’s testimony were deemed insufficient to undermine the overall credibility of the primary witness.

Delay in Reporting the Crime

Addressing concerns about the six-month delay in Avenido’s report to law enforcement, the court found the delay understandable given Avenido’s fugitive status and fear of being implicated. The court noted that such delays do not inherently discredit a witness's testimony.

Legal Findings on Treachery and Premeditation

The court recognized that the attack on Tero was executed with treachery, as he had no opportunity to defend hi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.