Title
People vs. Cabantug
Case
G.R. No. 25702
Decision Date
Oct 21, 1926
A 1925 communal labor gathering turned violent when Evaristo Cabantug, intoxicated, attacked Egmidio Deviente, leading to a fatal bolo fight. Evaristo and Paulino Cabantug were convicted of homicide, with the Supreme Court affirming the trial court's decision, rejecting alibi and self-defense claims.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 25702)

Facts of the Case

On the day of the incident, several individuals gathered in Jose Acebedo's rice field for a communal labor effort known as "daguiao," where food and alcoholic beverages, specifically tuba, were provided. Egmidio Deviente encountered the accused when he was invited to join the festivities and subsequently got involved in a drinking session. After being encouraged to participate in a finger contest, he refused and was later attacked by Evaristo Cabantug, who drew a bolo and inflicted a wound on Egmidio's calf. The fight escalated, resulting in multiple stab wounds inflicted by both Evaristo and Paulino Cabantug, ultimately leading to Egmidio’s death the following day.

Trial Court's Judgment

The trial court found both Evaristo and Paulino Cabantug guilty of homicide and sentenced them each to twelve years and one day of reclusion temporal. They were also ordered to jointly and severally indemnify the widow of the deceased in the sum of P500 and to bear the costs of the action. Melecio Cadiz, another accused, was acquitted.

Grounds for Appeal

The appellants presented various grounds for appealing the trial court's decision:

  1. They contested the court's finding of guilt for homicide, arguing that the evidence did not conclusively establish their culpability.
  2. Paulino Cabantug claimed the trial court failed to sufficiently consider his alibi.
  3. Evaristo Cabantug asserted that the circumstances of self-defense were overlooked.
  4. The appellants sought an outright acquittal based on the foregoing arguments.

Assessment of Witness Testimony

The appellate court analyzed the testimonies of witnesses, particularly focusing on the accounts provided by Jesus Deviente, who was 14 years old at the time, and Geronima Dasal, both of whom offered coherent and consistent narratives that corroborated one another regarding the sequence of events during the incident. The credibility of these witnesses was upheld as there was no apparent motive for them to fabricate their testimonies.

Defense Arguments Evaluated

Upon reviewing the defense of alibi presented by Paulino Cabantug, the appellate court concluded that the prosecution's evidence securely places him at the crime scene during the attack. Regarding Evaristo Cabantug's claim of self

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.