Title
People vs. Cabanlig
Case
G.R. No. L-48746
Decision Date
Mar 15, 1984
A 14-year-old girl was raped at a school event; the accused admitted guilt but failed to honor a settlement, leading to his conviction.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-48746)

Procedural History

Julio Cabanlig was accused of rape, and the trial was held in the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan. The trial court rendered its decision on June 20, 1978, finding Cabanlig guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentencing him to reclusion perpetua. He was also ordered to indemnify Isabel Distor in the amount of P6,000 and to pay court costs.

Testimony of the Complainant

Isabel Distor testified that while attending the girl scout camping, she was lured away from the group by Myrna Tadena and Paulina Bugaoan to urinate. Instead of going to the toilet, they proceeded to Cabanlig's house. After a brief period of conversation in the camarin owned by Cabanlig, Isabel was left alone, at which point Cabanlig confronted her, threatened her with a knife, and brutally raped her. Testimony indicated that Cabanlig assaulted Distor twice that night, disregarding her pleas for mercy.

Response of the Victim

After the assaults, Isabel returned to the school campus in the morning, feeling traumatized and fearful of further retaliation from Cabanlig if she disclosed the incident. It was several days later, after her father was informed by school officials, that she felt compelled to reveal the details of the rape, leading to the father's intervention through the local barrio captain.

Attempts at Settlement and Consequence

Despite attempts by local council members to mediate the situation by arranging a marriage between Isabel and Cabanlig, the accused subsequently married another woman, prompting Isabel and her family to initiate formal legal action against him.

Medical Examination and Evidence

Isabel underwent a medical examination on December 19, 1975, which resulted in a medico-legal certificate corroborating her allegations of sexual assault.

Findings of the Trial Court

The trial court noted several uncontested facts: Cabanlig engaged in sexual intercourse with Isabel when she was only 14 years old, both parties were single at the time, and an agreement to marry was made but never fulfilled. The court assessed the credibility of Isabel's testimony favorably, observing her demeanor and the consistency of her account.

Appeal and Arguments

Cabanlig's appeal centered on the contention that the trial court erred in convicting him of rape. He raised issues regarding Isabel's credibility, claiming inconsistencies in her testimony and questioning details like the absence of her name on the camping participants list, her allegations about being invited to Cabanlig’s home, and discrepancies concerning the threats made during the assault.

Judicial Observations on Credibility

The appellate court upheld the trial court's assessment of Isabel's credibility, emphasizing that the trial court had the superior vantage point to evaluate the evidence and the witnesses&

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.