Title
People vs. Buenaflor
Case
G.R. No. 140001
Decision Date
Jun 27, 2001
A 14-year-old alleged rape by Eduardo Buenaflor in 1998; delayed reporting, inconsistencies in testimony led to Supreme Court acquittal due to reasonable doubt.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 140001)

Procedural Background

This appeal arises from a decision rendered by the Regional Trial Court of Alaminos, Pangasinan, Branch 54, which found Buenaflor guilty of the crime of rape under Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by R.A. 7659. The trial court sentenced him to reclusion perpetua and awarded moral damages of P50,000. Following this conviction, an appeal was filed, asserting multiple errors in the trial court's decision.

Allegations and Particulars

On March 14, 1998, Lourdes attended a fiesta with her half-brother and his family, along with her siblings, where they all slept in a single bedroom. The incident allegedly occurred when Buenaflor entered the room while everyone was asleep, threatened Lourdes, and proceeded to sexually assault her. The complainant testified that she experienced significant pain during the assault but was unable to shout due to fear induced by Buenaflor's threats.

Medical Examination

Following the alleged assault, Lourdes underwent a medical examination, resulting in a Medico-Legal Certificate that indicated healed hymenal lacerations consistent with sexual intercourse.

Defense and Trial Court Findings

Buenaflor denied the allegations, asserting he was not present during the alleged incident and claiming inconsistencies in Lourdes' testimony. The trial court found the prosecution's evidence compelling and convicted him based on Lourdes' testimony, which it deemed credible despite her emotional trauma.

Grounds for Appeal

In the appeal, the defense raised several grounds, arguing that the trial court erred in convicting Buenaflor without proving his guilt beyond reasonable doubt, giving undue credence to the complainant's testimony while ignoring the defense's account, and erroneously interpreting contradictions in Lourdes’ statements as signs of trauma.

Evaluation of Credibility

The appellate court emphasized the importance of the complainant's credibility in rape cases. It reviewed the inconsistencies in her testimony, noting multiple contradictions concerning whether others were present during the assault, her familiarity with Buenaflor, and her reactions post-incident. The court highlighted that her initial claim of not knowing the accused was contradicted by later admissions.

Judgement and Reasoning

The appellate court found the testimonies and evidence presented by the prosecution insufficient to meet the requisite standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. It stated that the inconsistencies in Lourdes' narrative were significant and not merely trivial, undermining the overall credibility of her

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.