Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Boller
Case
G.R. No. 144222-24
Decision Date
Apr 3, 2002
Three brothers convicted of homicide for fatally shooting victims at a copra kiln; alibi rejected, conspiracy proven, treachery unproven.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 144222-24)

Charges and Arraignment

On December 22, 1995, the accused-appellants were charged with three counts of murder, alleging that on October 27, 1995, they conspired to kill the victims using firearms. Upon arraignment, they pleaded not guilty to the charges. The cases were later consolidated for joint trial.

Incident Overview

On the day of the incident, while the victims were working at a copra kiln, they were attacked by the accused-appellants, who fired upon them with firearms. This attack resulted in the fatal shootings of the victims. Witness testimony established the presence of the accused at the crime scene, armed, and pointing their guns at the victims.

Eyewitness Accounts

Eyewitness Jacinto Orquin described how he saw the accused and heard the desperate last words of his brother, Jesus, pleading for help. Furthermore, another witness, Nixon de la Cruz, reported the wounding of his father, Lolito. The statement made by Lolito, wherein he identified his assailants, was documented by Barangay Captain Gutardo Berbis and confirmed his consciousness of impending death due to his wounds.

Autopsy Findings

Autopsies conducted on the victims revealed the grievous nature of their injuries. Each victim sustained serious gunshot wounds leading to their deaths, which corroborated the testimonies about the circumstances and manner of their deaths.

Defense Evidence

The accused-appellants presented alibi defenses, claiming they were elsewhere when the crime occurred. Ronito Boller stated that he was working on a farm, Dianito claimed to have been on duty at a military camp, and Francisco Boller indicated he was repairing a nipa roof. Witnesses were presented to corroborate these claims; however, the court remained unconvinced.

Prosecution's Evidence

The prosecution relied heavily on the dying declaration of Lolito de la Cruz and the testimonies of witnesses, who positively identified the accused as the perpetrators of the crime. The court found the evidence compelling and noted the consistency and clarity of the witness accounts.

Court's Decision

The Regional Trial Court convicted the accused-appellants of three counts of murder, sentencing them to reclusion perpetua and imposing indemnity to the heirs of each victim. They appealed, raising several assignments of error concerning the admissibility of the dying declaration, the evidence of treachery, and the sufficiency of proof for murder.

Legal Analysis of Dying Declaration

The court upheld the admissibility of the dying declaration of Lolito de la Cruz, affirming that it met the requisite conditions—concerning the cause of death, consciousness of impending death, competency, and relevance to the charge. The court clarified that the requirement for a dying declaration does not necessitate verbatim reproduction of the declarant's words.

Defense of Alibi and Response

The court expressed skepticism toward the alibi defense, emphasizing that the accused-a

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.