Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Bohol y Talaogan
Case
G.R. No. 178198
Decision Date
Dec 10, 2008
Evelyn Bohol orchestrated her husband Steven's murder, conspiring with assailants who shot him while he slept. Convicted of murder, she was sentenced to reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 151021)

Factual Background

Steven Alston Davis and his long-time friend Michael Dunn were at Steven's apartment on the evening of July 17, 2002. After going to sleep, they were attacked by three men armed with handguns at approximately 2:00 AM, who invaded Steven's room and shot him four times, resulting in his death. Michael Dunn, who was present, attempted to revive Steven but was unsuccessful. Emergency responders confirmed Steven's death upon arrival.

Procedural History

Charges of murder were initially brought against Arnold Adoray and Alexander Dagami, while Evelyn Bohol was later charged for their involvement in the conspiracy to murder Steven. During the proceedings, Robin Butas testified against Evelyn, stating that she had conspired with Arnold and himself to carry out the murder. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found Evelyn guilty of murder on November 25, 2004, sentencing her to reclusion perpetua, citing conspiracy and treachery as qualifying factors.

Appellant’s Arguments

Evelyn Bohol contended that her conviction was erroneous and that her guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. She claimed that Robin Butas's testimony should not hold weight due to his motivations as a state witness and asserted that her absence from the scene of the crime indicated her lack of direct involvement. She questioned the presence of treachery in the incident and maintained that her intentions and motives were not adequately established.

Legal Analysis of Credibility and Testimony

The Supreme Court underscored the importance of witness credibility in evaluating guilt. The appellate court affirmed the decision of the RTC based on the sufficiency and consistency of Robin Butas's testimony, which was corroborated by physical evidence—specifically, the autopsy report detailing the gunshot wounds to Steven’s body. The fact that Robin was originally charged as a co-conspirator but later became a state witness did not inherently discredit his testimony. Furthermore, the court concluded that the corroboration provided by Robin's wife, who is also Evelyn’s sister, bolstered the credibility of the testimony.

Conviction of Murder and Treachery

To constitute murder, the crime must be committed with treachery, which involves a surprise attack that deprives the victim of any opportunity to defend themselves. In this case, the attack on Steven was executed while he was asleep and defenseless. The court found that although Evelyn did not shoot Steven, her participation in the conspiracy was evident as she provided access to the apartment and encouraged the actions of the co-conspirators.

Establishing Conspiracy

Conspiracy requires proof of an agreement to commit a felony, which may be demonstrated through circumstantial evidence. The court established that Evelyn induced the assailants, provided the keys to Steven's apartment, and acted as a guide to the crime scene. Her actions before, during, and after the murder indicated a coordinated effort to execute the crime, satisfying the legal threshold for conspiracy.

Rejection of Alibi Defense

Evelyn's alibi was deemed weak given the evidence presented. The proximity of Angeles City to Makati, together w

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.