Title
People vs. Biruar
Case
G.R. No. L-32202-04
Decision Date
Jul 25, 1984
Armed men robbed Mosende, set Kalitas' house on fire, and killed Kalitas during another robbery. Defendants convicted of robbery, arson, and homicide.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-32202-04)

Inculpatory Facts: The Two Houses, the Gunfire, and the Fire

At about ten o’clock in the evening of July 2, 1966, Gorgonio Mosende and his wife Fausta were preparing to sleep in their house when several persons arrived and called “Good evening, tiyo.” Thinking they were relatives, Mosende invited them to come up. Two armed men, later identified as Romualdo Raboy and Edgardo Seneres, demanded where Mosende’s firearm was. Mosende denied having a gun. Fausta, fearing for their lives, told the armed men that they need not kill her husband if they wanted the shotgun, and she pointed to a shotgun covered by the mosquito net.

Seneres took the shotgun and demanded money. Fausta opened their aparador, which was ransacked by Seneres, who took P170.00 in coins and paper bills. The two armed men then left, taking Mosende’s shotgun valued at P550.00.

Not long thereafter, gunshots were heard from the direction of the neighboring house of George Kalitas, about twenty-five meters away. Mosende and his wife sought cover behind a coconut tree as a blaze began from Kalitas’s house and rapidly spread until the entire structure was engulfed and completely burned.

The Kalitas House: Victims, Entry, Plunder, and Killing

The Kalitas residence housed multiple inmates who were asleep when the firing started: George Kalitas, a seventy-year-old paraplegic, his wife Sylvia Mingming, their grandchildren Jessie Renopal and “Bebot”, and their maid’s son Fortunato “Ato” Malapong. Narciso Bauyot, a nephew of Kalitas, slept in the dining room, while the maid Babbadon Odal slept in the kitchen.

Odal rushed to the master’s bedroom to get Ato but was hit by a bullet on her left wrist, lost consciousness, and regained it only at the Mati Baptist Hospital, where she was treated. Jessie, also struck by a grazing bullet in the head, did not lose consciousness and therefore saw five robbers enter while two others stayed by the door.

Narciso ran toward the kitchen and hid in an aparador. When the toilet of the main house was set on fire, he left his hiding place and passed through a small window to escape. He landed safely but was seized by Romualdo Raboy, who pointed a gun at his abdomen and threatened to kill him if he did not surrender. Edgardo Seneres ordered Narciso to surrender and raise his hands. Seneres then continued firing at the house. Another armed man, identified as Saturnino Galliano, approached Narciso and threatened to pour kerosene on him. Narciso pleaded and was spared; Galliano instead poured kerosene on the walls of the kitchen and ignited it using dried fronds.

The robbers then broke open the main door with an axe. Kalitas, after being hit by early gunfire, fired back using his Stevens 12-gauge shotgun, hitting one of them. George Kalitas then crawled with his wife and grandchildren after Jessie and Odal were hit. Despite this resistance, Kalitas was fired upon and dropped his shotgun. His grandson “Bebot” picked up the shotgun but, when commanded to surrender and throw the gun downstairs, panicked and threw it to the robbers.

Thereafter, four armed men, identified as Angel Dy, Romualdo Raboy, Saturnino Galliano, and Abraham Lim, rushed the victims. Dy held Mrs. Kalitas by the neck and kicked the wounded George Kalitas. The others forcibly opened a trunk under the bed containing cash of P40,000.00, allegedly kept by Kalitas, and also took old coins kept by Mrs. Kalitas in a container inside the trunk. Dy and Galliano also got money from Jessie Renopal. After taking the items, the robbers left. The inmates carried the wounded to the hospital, but George Kalitas died before reaching it.

The fire continued until the main house, its bodega, and a truck parked between the buildings were completely destroyed, with the total value stated as P34,545.00.

Investigation and Identification Through the Buick Sedan and Firearms

Police investigation followed immediately. Sgt. Jose Blones of the 433rd PC Company conducted an inquiry. He learned that a light green Buick Electra 225 sedan (1964) with Plate No. H-6357-Manila-65 had been refueled at a Caltex gasoline station in the poblacion of Mati and then proceeded toward Barrio Limot at around 9:00 o’clock in the evening of July 2, 1966, and was later seen parked at some distance from Kalitas’s house.

From the smoldering Kalitas house, Blones recovered twenty-nine spent cartridges of various calibers and a mutilated slug, which he turned over for investigation. Police efforts were also launched to intercept the Buick and apprehend its occupants.

On July 3, 1966, Pat. Bonifacio Dano of the Davao City Police Department received a telephone call that the wanted vehicle was moving toward Davao City. Dano and companions intercepted the car at Bajada near EMCOR, observed a man alight with a sack, and pursued him. The man threw the sack away and disappeared into tall cogon grasses. The sack was found to contain a pistolized carbine, a .45 cal. pistol with ammunition, a barong tagalog, four flashlights, and gloves.

On July 4, 1966, another police team saw the Buick parked at the corner of Monteverde and Guerrero Streets in front of the Cosmopolitan Funeral Parlor. Angel Dy was inside. When asked about the car’s owner, Dy pointed to Onting Biruar at the funeral parlor. The police fetched Onting Biruar together with Romualdo Raboy and Edgardo Seneres and brought them to police headquarters.

During questioning, Angel Dy informed the police that the car was driven by Abraham Lim on the night of July 2, 1966. Dy led the police to barrios in Davao City to locate Lim, but failed to find him. The police then found Ceferino Caturan in Barrio Piapi nursing a bullet wound on his left upper leg. Dy later guided the police to a house in Toril, where Abraham Lim was found together with Eugene Ruslin. A .45 cal. pistol with seven rounds was recovered under the pillow used by Lim.

Later, the police arrested Saturnino Galliano, who had been implicated in the crime. In the course of inspecting the Buick, a .45 cal. pistol with seven rounds was also recovered hidden under the floor mat near the gas pedal.

Based on these events, the accused were charged in the Court of First Instance of Davao in three informations for Robbery in Band, Arson, and Robbery with Homicide and Physical Injuries, respectively in Crim. Case Nos. 9987, 9988, and 9989.

Defenses Raised at Trial and the Trial Court’s Credibility Findings

All accused denied the crimes. Abraham Lim presented an alibi, while the others advanced denials and explanations concerning travel, hotel stays, and alleged involvement only through circumstances like car ownership or incidental presence.

The trial court, after weighing the evidence, rejected the defenses and held that, except for Onting Biruar (the owner of the Buick) and Eugene Ruslin (found with Lim during Lim’s arrest), the other accused actively participated in the commission of the offenses. It relied heavily on the prosecution witnesses’ identification and the perceived implausibility and inconsistency in the defendants’ stories.

In particular, the trial court found Abraham Lim’s claim that he went to Kalitas’s house merely to collect a debt improbable, stressing that Lim supposedly brought armed men to a target home at midnight, demanded payment with armed force, and afterward could not coherently explain how the shooting and injuries occurred if the objective were only collection of accounts. The court also emphasized that Kalitas was a wounded, sickly man confronted by an armed group, which made Lim’s narrative appear unnatural. It treated the prosecution witnesses’ accounts as natural and straightforward, finding no motive to fabricate.

The trial court further addressed defense attacks on the prosecution evidence. It rejected arguments that a witness could not recall minor biographical details, noting that the key testimony related to the refueling and presence of the Buick, which was not genuinely disputed. It likewise held that challenges to a sworn statement’s preparation did not warrant reversal because the convictions rested on testimony given in court and subjected to cross-examination. Finally, it dismissed the defense claim that no robbery occurred in Kalitas’s house due to lack of recovery of the stolen money, reasoning that the trunk under the bed contained money, the accused opened it and took the cash, and the absence of the property did not create reasonable doubt where the thing could not be recovered because the house was burned and because other participants who were not charged could plausibly have retained the money.

Trial Court Disposition

The Court of First Instance found the accused guilty and imposed penalties corresponding to each case:
In Crim. Case No. 9987 for Robbery in Band, each accused was sentenced to an indeterminate penalty ranging from two (2) years and four (4) months of prision correccional as minimum to eight (8) years and one (1) day of prision mayor as maximum, plus accessory penalties, with joint and several indemnity to Gorgonio Mosende of P720.00, without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and payment of costs.
In Crim. Case No. 9988 for Arson, each accused was sentenced to reclusion perpetua, with accessory penalties, payment of P20,000.00 jointly and severally to the heirs of George Kalitas, without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and payment of costs.
In Crim. Case No. 9989 for Robbery with Homicide and Physical Injuries, each accused was sentenced to death and ordered to indemnify the heirs of George Kalitas in P12,000.00, without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency.

Issues Raised on Appeal and the Court’s Treatment of Defenses

On appeal, the accused raised issues that included: (a) denial of their alleged presence and participation; (b) attack on the credibility of prosecution witnesses based on alleged inconsistencies and defects in affidavits; (c) contention that only one offense was committed on the theory that the robbery i





...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.