Title
People vs. Benito
Case
G.R. No. 36979
Decision Date
Nov 23, 1932
Miguel Benito, cashier at Harvester’s Davao branch, misappropriated P15,000.01, falsified bank documents, and concealed records from Nov 1930 to Sept 1931, convicted for estafa and falsification.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 36979)

Crime Charges and Allegations

The defendant was charged with estafa, which pertains to the unlawful appropriation of property with intent to defraud, specifically through the falsification of commercial documents. The charges stemmed from actions committed between November 1930 and September 1931, during which Benito, in his capacity as cashier for the International Harvester Company, failed to deposit a sum of P15,000.01 belonging to the company into the bank.

Evidence and Findings

Evidence presented in the trial showed that Benito received a total of P59,486.06 during his tenure from November 1, 1930 to September 6, 1931, yet only deposited P44,486.05, leaving a discrepancy of P15,000.01. His manipulation of financial records was evidenced through cash files and deposit slips he prepared. Additionally, Benito falsified bank reconciliation statements and monthly statements from the Philippine National Bank in order to conceal the misappropriation of funds.

Court’s Rationale and Legal Standards

The court dismissed the assignments of error raised by the defendant, asserting that the information charged him with two distinct crimes: estafa and the falsification of commercial documents. The court noted that although the defendant claimed insufficient evidence and procedural errors, the defendant had effectively waived such objections by proceeding to trial on the charges presented. The distinct nature of the offenses committed was also crucial; the falsification of documents was intended to conceal the crime of estafa rather than serve as a means for its commission, leading the court to affirm that both offenses warranted independent convictions.

Sentence Imposed

The court convicted Benito of estafa, resulting in a sentence of five years, four months, and twenty-one days of prision correccional, alongside accessory penalties and restitution of P15,000.01 to the International Harvester Company. Additionally, he received a separate sentence for the falsifica

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.