Title
People vs. Basite
Case
G.R. No. 150382
Decision Date
Oct 2, 2003
A 19-year-old polio victim, threatened with a knife, was raped by Basite. Despite no conclusive medical evidence, her credible testimony led to his conviction for simple rape, affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 150382)

Incident Overview

The events transpired on September 1, 1996, in Natuel, Buguias, Benguet, when AAA was en route to her parents' home in Tinoc, Ifugao, to collect her allowance. While walking, she encountered Basite, who attacked her after following her a short distance. Using a knife to threaten her, he forcibly undressed her and sexually assaulted her. After the assault, AAA managed to stab Basite and subsequently lost consciousness after rolling down a cliff.

Medical Examination and Initial Report

After the incident, AAA regained consciousness and made her way home, where she reported the rape to her relatives and subsequently filed a formal complaint. A medical examination revealed injuries that were inconsistent with her account of the assault, including no lacerations or signs of trauma to her vagina despite her claim of rape. The results indicated an intact hymen and other bodily scrapes, leading to conflicting narratives regarding the nature of the assault.

Accused's Defense

Basite denied the charges and brought witnesses, including Lidot Lacbao and Dr. Ronald Bandonill, who challenged AAA's credibility. Lacbao claimed that AAA denied being raped when she spoke to him shortly after the incident. Dr. Bandonill criticized the inadequacy of the medical examination report, arguing that a lack of physical signs of intercourse suggested no sexual act occurred.

Trial Court's Findings

The trial court assessed the case based on AAA's testimony, which was described as spontaneous and consistent, ultimately determining that it warranted conviction despite medical findings that did not comprehensively support the occurrence of rape. It established that the credibility of the victim’s account and her positive identification of Basite as her attacker were critical factors in the ruling.

Appeal and Appellate Court's Decision

In his appeal, Basite contended that reasonable doubt was created by the trial court’s acknowledgment of the shortcomings of the medical certificate. He also questioned the consistency of AAA's statements with those of witness Lacbao. The appellate court reiterated that in cases of rape, the testimony of the complainant can stand alone if found credible.

Conclusion of the Ruling

The appellate court concluded that despite the lack of corroborating medical evidence, AAA's testimony was credible and sufficient to

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.