Title
People vs. Bartolome
Case
G.R. No. 129486
Decision Date
Jul 4, 2008
Gloria Bartolome convicted of large-scale illegal recruitment and estafa for defrauding multiple victims with false promises of overseas employment, affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 184849)

Charges and Allegations

Gloria Bartolome faced four counts of illegal recruitment and four counts of estafa. The charges outlined significant allegations, including the unlawful recruitment of individuals with the promise of overseas employment in Bahrain without obtaining the required authority from the Department of Labor and Employment. Specific amounts of money were solicited from the complainants for processing and placement fees, which the accused allegedly failed to utilize for the promised purpose and subsequently misappropriated.

Proceedings and Initial Ruling

Upon her arraignment, Bartolome entered a plea of not guilty. The cases were jointly tried, during which the prosecution presented testimonies from the complainants—Fe Rollon, Raymundo Dimatulac, Esperanza Buhay, and Reynaldo Rollon—who collectively provided accounts of their dealings with the accused. They recounted how Bartolome and Capawan persuaded them to pay substantial sums, assuring them of employment abroad. The RTC found Bartolome guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the charges on November 10, 1992, resulting in her sentencing to jail time and fines, including a total indemnification to the victims.

Appeal to the Court of Appeals

Bartolome subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), which modified the initial ruling on February 19, 1997, affirming the conviction but imposing a heavier penalty of life imprisonment and a fine of P100,000, classifying the activities as illegal recruitment on a large scale, amounting to economic sabotage. The CA emphasized that the convicted actions involved multiple victims and thus warranted heightened penalties.

Further Developments and Hawking Attempts

Following her conviction in the appellate court, Bartolome sought a reconsideration, which was denied. Her case subsequently made its way to the Supreme Court when the CA forwarded the records due to the life imprisonment penalty. However, Bartolome had jumped bail, complicating her scenario further as she became a fugitive from justice, eluding law enforcement efforts to arrest her.

Supreme Court Analysis

In the Supreme Court, Bartolome maintained her innocence, claiming the evidence was insufficient and asserting that the illegal recruitment activities were primarily carried out by Capawan. However, the Supreme Court found the arguments unconvincing, reaffirming the criteria for establishing illegal recruitment which involves lacking the necessary license and conducting recruitment activities.

Affirmation of Guilt and Sentencing

The Court affirmed the lower courts' decisions that Bartolome was guilty of illegal recruitment in large scale due to h

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.