Title
People vs. Balondo
Case
G.R. No. L-27401
Decision Date
Oct 31, 1969
Diego Balondo confessed to brutally murdering and mutilating his 16-year-old niece in 1966. Despite his guilty plea, the Supreme Court reduced his death sentence to reclusion perpetua, citing mitigating circumstances and insufficient votes for capital punishment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 220613)

Facts of the Case

On September 29, 1966, Diego Balondo was charged with murdering Gloria Bulasa, his niece. The acts described in the information indicated that Balondo intentionally attacked and killed Bulasa with treachery and evident premeditation. The brutal nature of the crime was evident from the detailed description of the injuries inflicted on the victim, as well as the subsequent actions taken by Balondo after the murder.

Admission and Investigation

Immediately after the discovery of Bulasa’s body, Balondo confessed to his crime during police interrogation, detailing the methods he employed to kill and mutilate her body. His confession, recorded in the Visayan dialect, was sent to the municipal judge. Eyewitness accounts from relatives of the victim corroborated Balondo's statements, further strengthening the case against him. A post-mortem examination confirmed the heinous nature of the murder.

Arraignment and Plea

Balondo was arraigned before the Court of First Instance of Leyte on October 24, 1966. He was provided with legal counsel, Atty. Delia Tantuico, and voluntarily pleaded guilty to the murder charge. The trial court accepted his plea, leading to the rendering of a decision.

Trial Court's Findings

The trial court highlighted the gravity of the offense, noting the particularly egregious acts committed by Balondo, who not only killed his niece but also mutilated her body and consumed part of it. The court found that Balondo’s actions exhibited a severe disregard for human dignity and constituted murder with aggravating circumstances, including the abuse of superior strength and disregard for the victim's sex.

Defense Claims

Defense counsel, Atty. Justo R. Albert, contended that Balondo should have undergone a psychiatric evaluation to determine his sanity at the time of the crime. However, the court dismissed this plea, emphasizing sufficient evidence that Balondo was not insane when he committed the crime. His repeated and consistent confessions established his awareness and culpability.

Legal Analysis

The trial court determined that Balondo committed murder under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code, considering two aggravating circumstances against him: abuse of superior strength and disregard for the victim'

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.