Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Ballabare
Case
G.R. No. 108871
Decision Date
Nov 19, 1996
Accused Gerry Ballabare convicted of homicide and illegal firearm possession after a 1990 double killing in Palawan; recantation and desistance claims dismissed, conspiracy and treachery unproven.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 182075)

Background of the Incident

Gerry Ballabare and his brother, Eder Ballabare, were implicated in double murder charges involving the Tacadao brothers, which occurred during a commotion involving a confrontation outside a residence in Sitio Isumbo, Barangay Pulot II. The Information cited treachery and the use of illegally possessed firearms during the commission of the crime, leading to charges in Criminal Cases Nos. 9067 and 9071.

Prosecution's Evidence

The prosecution presented detailed eyewitness testimony from Tessie Asenita, who recounted the events leading up to the shooting. She stated that her brother Juan intervened in a violent altercation involving Eder Ballabare, resulting in both Juan and Leonardo being shot by the accused. Additional evidence included forensic findings from Dr. Narciso B. Leoncio, who conducted the autopsy, and Aida Veloria Magsipoc, who testified regarding the paraffin test on Gerry Ballabare's hands, which showed positive for gunpowder nitrates.

Defense's Arguments

Gerry Ballabare claimed he was playing basketball away from the scene during the incident, asserting an alibi supported by a witness. The defense also filed affidavits seeking to withdraw witness testimony, indicating a lack of interest from the victims' family in pursuing the case.

Trial Court's Findings

The Regional Trial Court of Branch 50 found Gerry Ballabare guilty of both the murders based on credible eyewitness account and evidence presented. The trial court emphasized the presumption of innocence, yet deemed it was overcome by the prosecution's strong evidence.

Allegations of Error

The accused-appellant raised several assignments of error on appeal, challenging the credibility of the prosecutorial evidence, alleged violations of constitutional rights, and the trial court’s procedures. His primary arguments included the claim that the trial court disregarded potential recantation from Tessie Asenita and failed to adequately consider the implications of an affidavit withdrawing her testimony.

Recantation and Hearsay Considerations

The court addressed the alleged recantation, highlighting that Tessie Asenita's affidavit did not constitute a formal recantation but expressed a lack of desire to pursue prosecution due to familial pressures. The absence of her direct presence during re-examination rendered her affidavit hearsay and insufficient to negate her initial testimony.

Evidence Weight and Witness Credibility

After reviewing the evidence, the court highlighted the importance of the paraffin test results and the sole witness’s testimony, concluding that the prosecution presented a coherent case. It upheld the adjudication of guilt despite the defense's claims pertaining to alibi.

Conspiracy and Co-accused Considerations

While there were indications that Eder Ballabare may have acted in concert with Gerry, the court determined that conspiracy was not sufficiently established regarding the mutual agreement to commit the crime. The evidence did not prove a prior conspiracy among the accused to target the victims specifically.

Ve

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.