Title
People vs. Baldera
Case
G.R. No. L-2390
Decision Date
Apr 24, 1950
A 1947 bus robbery in Batangas led to homicide and injuries. Pedro Baldera, identified by witnesses and his confession, was convicted of robbery with homicide, sentenced to life imprisonment after Supreme Court review.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-2390)

Incident Overview

On the morning of December 23, 1947, a Casa Manila bus was hijacked by five or six armed men while traveling from Batangas to Manila. Pedro Baldera, identified as a participant, fired a weapon during the hold-up, resulting in multiple injuries to passengers. Jose Cabrera succumbed to his injuries the following day. Baldera and Miguel Blay were indicted for the robbery that involved homicide and injuries, with Baldera receiving a sentence of death following court proceedings.

Legal Proceedings and Evidence

The procedural history reveals that four individuals were initially charged, with two defendants being dismissed due to insufficient evidence. Baldera and Blay were found guilty, with Baldera facing capital punishment. The case primarily hinged on the identification of Baldera as one of the perpetrators.

Identification of the Appellant

The prosecution presented testimonies from passengers who narrowly escaped the hold-up. Baldera was arrested shortly afterward for another crime, and he confessed to his involvement in the robbery after his apprehension. Ponciana Villena, a key witness, positively identified Baldera as the assailant threatening her for money. Baldera attempted to establish an alibi, claiming he was working elsewhere on the night of the crime; however, this was unsupported by any corroborating evidence.

Confession and Its Admissibility

Baldera's confession was contested on the grounds of coercion, with claims of a promise of immunity. However, the appellate court found no evidence of threats or coercion. The court had previously ruled that confessions obtained under promises could still be utilized if they did not involve force or intimidation. In this case, Baldera's participation in the robbery was deemed satisfactorily proven, independent of his confession.

Robbery in Band and Legal Definitions

The court also examined the classification of the crime as "robbery in band.” Despite Baldera's defense challenging the number of armed individuals involved, the evidence supported claims of more than three perpetrators. Nevertheless, the legal analysis indicated that the robbery could still be classified under robbery with homicide without necessarily fulfilling the criteria for being in band.

Verdict and Sentencing

The appellate court agreed with the conviction but acknowledged an error regarding the consideration of recidivism, as the previous theft occurred after the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.