Title
People vs. Avero
Case
G.R. No. 76483
Decision Date
Aug 30, 1988
A 12-year-old girl was raped by her uncle, who threatened her life. Despite delayed reporting due to fear, the court upheld her credible testimony, rejected his alibi, and convicted him.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-48746)

Factual Background

Dominador Avero was convicted of rape and sentenced to reclusion perpetua by the Regional Trial Court of Abra, Branch I. The charge stemmed from an incident in which 12-year-old Janet Avero reported being assaulted on her way home from washing clothes at the river, where she was confronted by Dominador, who forcibly took her to a secluded area and raped her.

Evidence Presented

Janet detailed her ordeal, noting that she screamed for help but was silenced by Avero. She described his threats of violence should she report the incident, which initially prevented her from informing her father. After eight days, she disclosed the assault, leading to a formal report to the Philippine Constabulary and a medical examination. Her father corroborated her account, providing details of Janet’s emotional state following the incident.

Medical Examination Findings

Dr. Adela Vera Cruz conducted a medical examination of Janet, revealing findings consistent with sexual assault, including old lacerations on the hymen, which supported the allegations of rape.

Defense Argument

The defendant, Dominador Avero, offered an alibi, claiming he was visiting a relative in a different town during the time of the assault. However, the trial court rejected this defense due to its lack of corroborative evidence and the compelling nature of the victim’s testimony.

Assessment of Credibility

The trial court found Janet's testimony credible, noting her young age and suggesting that it was implausible for her to fabricate such allegations against her own uncle. The court emphasized that in cases of rape, conviction often hinges on the credibility of the victim.

Appellate Review Standards

In reviewing the evidence, appellate courts generally defer to the trial court’s findings due to its better position for assessing witness credibility and demeanor. This principle was upheld, reaffirming the conviction based on a thorough evaluation of the testimonies and evidence presented.

Delay in Reporting

Avero’s defense claimed that Janet’s delay in reporting the incident undermined her credibility. However, established jurisprudence asserts that the reactions of young victims can be unpredictable, especially when threats are involved, supporting the legitimacy of her delayed report.

Flight as Indic

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.