Title
People vs. Aspili
Case
G.R. No. 89418-19
Decision Date
Nov 21, 1990
Six convicts boarded a motor launch, committed robbery, raped two minors, and caused two deaths. Convicted of robbery with homicide, aggravated by rape, with modified penalties.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 89418-19)

Criminal Allegations

The accused were charged with the crimes of rape with homicide and robbery in band, with several aggravating circumstances including the use of firearms, taking advantage of nighttime, and recidivism. The prosecution presented evidence that on the date specified, the accused, armed with pistols and bolos, forcibly boarded the motor launch M/L Elsa and initiated a violent attack against the passengers and crew, leading to multiple rapes and the deaths of two minors, Daisy Gonzales and Yolanda Argue, due to drowning.

Prosecution's Evidence and Testimonies

The Solicitor General summarized the prosecution's evidence, detailing how the accused executed their plan to escape from the nearby penal colony by intimidating the crew and passengers. Josie Gonzales, a 13-year-old victim, testified that she was raped multiple times by different accused while a gun was pointed at her. Similarly, Narcisa Batayola, a 15-year-old victim, corroborated this account with her own testimony of being raped by several of the accused.

Defense's Position

The defense, represented by the counsel of the accused, argued that the events were misrepresented. They claimed the accused intended to escape from the penal colony rather than commit the alleged crimes. They stated that Josie Gonzales had consented to intercourse under duress, and that the incidents were not a collective conspiracy but isolated acts.

Trial Court's Findings

The Regional Trial Court found the six accused guilty of the crimes charged, emphasizing the overwhelming evidence of their guilt, including witness testimonies and the physical examination of the victims, which confirmed sexual penetration. The trial court also determined that the actions of the accused constituted a conspiracy to commit the crimes as all were seen participating in the violent acts.

Appellate Court's Ruling and Corrections

Upon appeal, the Appellate Court clarified that the trial court had erred in categorizing the crime as rape with homicide aggravated by robbery in band. Instead, the court recognized the offense as a special complex crime of robbery with homicide, with rape merely acting as an aggravating circumstance. The appellate court held that the original intent was to commit robbery, and the ensuing rapes were adjunct to that primary objective.

Aggravating Circumstances and Penalties

The appellate court affirmed the aggravating circumstances of recidivism, use of superior strength, and the involvement of an armed band. However, it rejected the aggravation of nocturnity and the use of craft, asserting that the commission of the crime did not specifically exploit nighttime conditions or involve deceit. As for penalties, the court modified the lower court's decision, reducing the imposed sentences from two separate reclusion perpetu

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.