Title
People vs. Alquizalas y Alquilita
Case
G.R. No. 128386
Decision Date
Mar 25, 1999
Accused-appellant convicted of raping a 15-year-old girl through force and intimidation, using a knife and physical blows; claims of consent rejected, damages awarded.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 128386)

Relevant Dates

The crime occurred on October 5, 1995, and the Regional Trial Court of Barili, Cebu, Branch 60 rendered a decision on September 12, 1996. The resulting appeal was decided on March 25, 1999.

Applicable Law

The legal framework governing the case is Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code concerning the crime of rape.

Charge and Plea

Judito Alquizalas was charged with rape under an information filed on October 30, 1995. He pleaded not guilty during his arraignment, which led to a trial on the merits.

Trial Court Proceedings

The trial court found the accused guilty of rape, believing the prosecution proved his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Alquizalas was sentenced to reclusion perpetua and ordered to pay moral damages of P50,000.00 and exemplary damages of P25,000.00 to the complainant.

Testimony of the Complainant

Marissa Bayang testified that on the day in question, Alquizalas lured her to an isolated area under the pretense of getting medicine water for her sick grandfather. Once there, he assaulted her with a hunting knife, physically overpowered her, and proceeded to have sexual intercourse with her against her will. Medical examination confirmed injuries consistent with sexual assault.

Defense of the Accused

Judito Alquizalas presented a contrasting version of the events, claiming consensual sexual intercourse after a brief romance. He argued that the absence of a strong physical resistance from the complainant indicated consent, thereby denying the allegations of rape.

Assessment of the Arguments

The appellate court noted that the complainant's behavior post-incident does not conform to any single expected response, particularly given the trauma. The court reaffirmed that the presence of violence and intimidation, including the use of a knife, met the necessary legal threshold for rape.

Evaluation of Evidence

The court found the complainant's testimony credible, especially noting her emotional state during the proceedings. Witness testimonies, including medical evidence of lacerations and blood, reinforced her clai

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.