Title
People vs. Almendras
Case
G.R. No. L-33327
Decision Date
Jul 30, 1982
Florentino Almendras shot Clemente Abellanosa from a motorcycle in Cebu City, 1970. Eyewitnesses, recovered weapon, and weak alibi led to his murder conviction, affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-33327)

Incident Overview

At approximately 2:00 a.m. on August 8, 1970, while riding as a passenger on a motorcycle, Clemente Abellanosa was shot by Almendras, who was also riding on a motorcycle. Following this attack, Abellanosa succumbed to his injuries the following day. The police initiated an investigation, which resulted in charges being filed against Almendras on August 13, 1970, for murder under Criminal Case No. CCC-XIV-136 in the Circuit Criminal Court of Cebu City.

Arraignment and Trial Court Decision

During his arraignment on August 24, 1970, Almendras pleaded not guilty. After a trial, the court delivered a decision on February 27, 1971, which found Almendras guilty of murder and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua, restitution to the victim’s heirs, confiscation of the murder weapon, and the payment of legal costs.

Prosecution's Evidence

The prosecution's case hinged on eyewitness accounts, notably from Marcelo Alit, who testified that he and Abellanosa were fired upon by Almendras. Following the shooting, Almendras and his companion attempted to flee but crashed their motorcycle. A police patrol intercepted the scene and arrested both men. The murder weapon was recovered, further linking Almendras to the crime through both physical evidence and eyewitness identification.

Police Response and Eyewitness Identification

Patrolman Dionisio Cabantan’s testimony played a critical role in the case. He provided the account of pursuing the motorcycle after the shooting and observing Almendras discarding the revolver. Alit positively identified Almendras as the shooter, while additional corroboration came from the recovery of the weapon, which contained live rounds and empty shells.

Defense Argument

Almendras' defense was based on denial and an alibi. He claimed to have been at another location when the shooting occurred, suggesting he was unfairly treated by the police during his arrest. However, this defense was challenged by the direct evidence presented by witnesses.

Assessment of Credibility

The court assessed the credibility of witness testimonies, noting that the circumstances surrounding the identification of Almendras were compelling. Despite arguments that the commonality of a

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.