Title
People vs. Alfon
Case
G.R. No. 126028
Decision Date
Mar 14, 2003
Appellant Expedito Alfon stabbed Tomas Alferez, causing his death. Eyewitnesses testified to the attack, and treachery was proven. The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction, modified damages, and imposed reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 126028)

Charges and Incident Details

Alfon was charged with murder based on an information that detailed the incident occurring on February 18, 1993, in Barangay Oring, Caramoan, Camarines Sur, wherein he allegedly stabbed the victim with a fan knife (balisong), resulting in the victim's instantaneous death. The information specified that the act was committed with intent to kill, treachery, and evident premeditation.

Trial and Arraignment

Following his arraignment on July 28, 1993, where he pleaded not guilty, the trial court heard testimonies from four witnesses. The prosecution's case centered around eyewitness accounts detailing the attack and an autopsy report confirming the cause of death as stab wounds.

Eyewitness Testimonies

Vicente Eusebio testified seeing Alfon suddenly stab Alferez while following him, hitting him on the chest and ribs. Manuel Rayoso provided similar testimony, identifying Alfon as the attacker. Dr. Aguirre confirmed in her autopsy findings that the victim sustained two fatal stab wounds and classified the cause of death as profuse hemorrhage secondary to stab wounds.

Defense Strategy and Testimony

Alfon mounted a defense based on denial, asserting that he was not responsible for the stabbing and contending that Rodolfo Alferez had attacked the victim. Alfon stated that he had been pursued by the victim and Rodolfo, asserting that a fistfight led to the fatal stabbing inflicted by Rodolfo. However, his testimony lacked supporting evidence and credibility.

Court Findings and Conclusion

The trial court found the eyewitness testimonies credible and established beyond reasonable doubt that Alfon committed the murder with treachery, rejecting his defense as mere denial without corroboration. The court noted that the testimonials portrayed a planned and unexpected attack, qualifying the act as treacherous despite the frontal nature of the stabbing.

Assigned Errors in Appeal

In his appeal, Alfon alleged errors in the trial court's credibility assessment concerning witnesses, the finding of treachery, and his own liability for damages. The Court examined these claims, affirming the trial court's decision based on the consistency and reliability of the eyewitness accounts and finding treachery present given the circumstances of the attack.

Modifications to Civil Liability

While the Court upheld the civil

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.