Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Alfeche y Tamparong
Case
G.R. No. 124213
Decision Date
Aug 17, 1998
A 17-year-old domestic helper was raped twice by Dante Alfeche, resulting in pregnancy. The Supreme Court acquitted him of the first rape due to insufficient evidence but upheld his death penalty for the second, citing aggravating circumstances and credible testimony.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 124213)

Jurisdiction and Applicable Law

The case falls under the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines as amended, specifically Article 335, under the guidelines set by Republic Act No. 7659 regarding the imposition of the death penalty on severe crimes.

Factual Background

The complaints of rape were brought by Analiza Duroja, a 17-year-old domestic helper, detailing two separate incidents occurring at the residence of her employer. The first rape was reported to have occurred when Analiza was home alone and was attacked by three men, including Dante, who was apprehended, and two others, Willy and John Doe, who remained at large. The second incident occurred under similar circumstances.

Trial Process

After waiving preliminary investigation, Dante was arraigned and entered a plea of innocence. The prosecution presented several witnesses, including Analiza, who recounted her experiences during both incidents, while the defense relied on testimonies claiming alibi.

Victim Testimony and Evidence

Analiza described being physically assaulted during both incidents. In the first instance, she was rendered unconscious and discovered signs of sexual assault upon regaining consciousness. In the second incident, she reported being forcibly held and raped. The medical examination indicated physical injuries consistent with the assault. Analiza's hesitance to report the rapes stemmed from fear and shame, exacerbated by threats against her family.

Defense and Counterarguments

Dante's defense hinged on the claim of an alibi, asserting he was elsewhere during the commission of the crimes and challenging Analiza's credibility by suggesting inconsistencies in her testimony. Despite these assertions, the trial court found Analiza’s account credible, given the emotional context and corroborating testimony from other witnesses.

Trial Court's Findings

The trial court rejected the defense's assertions, finding them less credible than Analiza's testimony. The court determined that the evidence, including the nature of the attacks and Analiza's behavior post-assault, corroborated the commission of rape as defined under the law. The trial court noted the presence of aggravating circumstances such as dwelling and the use of a weapon.

Sentencing

Dante was convicted of two counts of rape for which he was sentenced to death due to the severe nature of the crimes, including the involvement of multiple perpetrators and the use of a deadly weapon. The trial court awarded Analiza moral damages but did not initially include civil indemnity, a point later amended in the appellate decision.

Appellate Court Review

Upon review, the appellate court acknowledged that the first rape allegation lacked sufficient evidence given Analiza's unconsciousness at the time.

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.