Title
People vs. Alba
Case
G.R. No. 130627
Decision Date
May 31, 2001
A violent dispute over a 41-hectare fishpond led to the murder of Roberto Acevedo and attempted murder of Julito Magcope. Accused were convicted of murder and attempted murder, with penalties and damages affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 130627)

Procedural History

The case was brought before the Regional Trial Court in Aklan, Branch 5, where the accused were found guilty of murder and attempted murder. On June 18, 1997, they were sentenced to reclusion perpetua for the murder of Acevedo and received an indeterminate sentence for the attempted murder of Julito Magcope. The accused appealed this decision, contesting the sufficiency of evidence against them.

Facts of the Case

The events unfolded on July 25, 1990, when Randy Ricaforte, an employee of Acevedo, was working in the fishpond. He was approached by David Kingking, one of the accused, who was armed. Several accused subsequently opened fire on Acevedo's hut, forcing him to flee toward a nearby tower. During the pursuit, Gortayo stopped firing at Acevedo and instead used a grenade launcher, making threats against him. Ricaforte later learned of Acevedo's death, with the police finding his body at the scene.

Evidence Presented

The prosecution presented testimonies from witnesses, including Ricaforte and Magcope, who both provided detailed accounts of the shooting. They identified the accused as being actively involved in the attack. Medical examinations confirmed that Acevedo died of severe gunshot wounds, and the evidence suggested a conspiracy among the accused to kill him, driven by their lust for control over the fishpond.

Legal Findings

The trial court described the concept of "proof beyond reasonable doubt," asserting that moral certainty was all that was required for a conviction. The testimonies provided by the prosecution were found to be credible and compelling, contributing to a firm determination of guilt among the accused. Notably, the court emphasized that guilt could be established through the actions of any conspirator, thus not necessitating that each accused directly caused Acevedo's death.

Individual Culpability

The ruling detailed the specific roles each accused played in the attack, affirming that even those who did not fire their weapons could be held fully accountable for their participation in the conspiracy. There was also a reference made to Agueda T. Alba's motive against Acevedo, connected to the protracted dispute over the fishpond. The court noted the flight of some accused individuals from the scene post-crime as indicative of their guilt.

Attempted Murder

Regarding the attempted murder charge against Julito Magcope, it was determined that all accused were guilty of this offense as well. Magcope's testimony revealed that he was targeted directly after Acevedo fled, clearly showing that their intent to murder existed in relation to him.

Sentences and Damages

For the murder charge

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.