Title
People vs. Aguilar y Manzanillo
Case
G.R. No. 191396
Decision Date
Apr 17, 2013
Marilyn Aguilar was convicted for illegal sale and possession of shabu under RA 9165. Despite chain of custody lapses, the Supreme Court upheld her conviction, rejecting her defenses of denial and frame-up as unsubstantiated.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 191396)

Offenses Charged

Two separate Informations were filed against Aguilar in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasay City, charging her with:

  1. Possession of 0.31 grams of Methamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu) (Criminal Case No. 04-2962-CFM).
  2. Sale and delivery of 0.45 grams of Methamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu) (Criminal Case No. 04-2963-CFM).

Procedural Background

Aguilar, upon arraignment, pleaded not guilty to both charges. During the pre-trial, her defense counsel admitted certain documents and Aguilar's identity as the person arrested by police. The RTC considered the validity of Aguilar's arrest and the legality of the search conducted without a warrant as part of the issues for resolution.

Prosecution Evidence

The prosecution's case was primarily supported by the testimony of Police Officer 2 (PO2) Roel Medrano, who acted as the poseur-buyer during a buy-bust operation against Aguilar. Medrano detailed the operation, which included receiving information about drug dealing, planning the buy-bust, and the actual transaction with Aguilar. After the purchase, police arrested Aguilar and seized two sachets of shabu. A forensic chemist confirmed that both samples contained Methamphetamine Hydrochloride.

Defense Claims

Aguilar denied the charges, claiming she was extrajudicially apprehended by the police without explanation and contending that no buy-bust operation against her took place. She alleged police demanded a bribe for her release, claiming the drugs were planted. Her niece, Gerolyn A. Lazaro, testified in her defense but lacked specific details about the events.

RTC Ruling

The RTC found that the prosecution established Aguilar's guilt beyond reasonable doubt and convicted her:

  1. For Criminal Case No. 04-2962-CFM, she was sentenced to 12 years and 1 day to 14 years and 4 months, plus a fine of P300,000.
  2. For Criminal Case No. 04-2963-CFM, she received a sentence of life imprisonment and a fine of P500,000. The RTC ruled that Aguilar's defenses of denial and frame-up lacked credibility compared to the prosecution's evidence.

Court of Appeals Decision

Aguilar's appeal was filed, citing errors in the RTC's findings. The Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's decision, confirming that the prosecution proved Aguilar's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues Raised on Appeal

Aguilar contended that:

  1. The RTC erred in finding her guilty as her guilt was not established beyond reasonable doubt.
  2. The RTC failed to give weight to her defense of denial and frame-up.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court reviewed the records and found no reason to overturn the decisions of the lower courts. The elements of both illegal sale and possession of dangerous drugs were proven. The Court acknowledged that while the police did not follow exact protocols concerning the custody of the seized drugs, the chain of custody was sufficiently maintained as the integrity and evidentiary value of the evidence were preserved.

Defense of Denial and Frame-up

Aguilar's claims of denial and frame-up were not believed, as her accusations against the police lacked convincing evidence. Lazaro's testimony did not provide sufficient su

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.