Title
People vs. Acuna
Case
G.R. No. 94702
Decision Date
Oct 2, 1995
Three men conspired to kill Tranquilino Mariano in 1988, stabbing him multiple times. Eyewitnesses and autopsy confirmed the crime. The Supreme Court upheld their murder conviction, citing credible testimonies and abuse of superior strength, imposing reclusion perpetua and P50,000 indemnity.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 94702)

Background of the Case

On November 22, 1988, Tranquilino Mariano was killed by Ramos, Dionisio, and Carlito Acuna. The accused were charged with murder, with the information enumerating the circumstances surrounding the crime, including evident premeditation, abuse of superior strength, and treachery. Following their arrest on April 17, 1989, Ramos and Dionisio pleaded not guilty during their arraignment on June 28, 1989.

Evidence Presented

Witnesses testified that on the night of the murder, Ramos, Acuna, and Dionisio confronted Mariano outside Ramos's house. Eyewitnesses observed Acuna attacking Mariano with a piece of wood while the other two restrained him. The prosecution's case was bolstered by the testimonies of Victoria Magana and Luisa Blanco, who witnessed the assault. An autopsy conducted by Dr. Juanito B. Sacdalan revealed that Mariano sustained multiple stab wounds and had a hematoma on his left eye, corroborating the eyewitness accounts of violent physical assault.

Defense and Credibility of Witnesses

The defense relied on a strategy of simple denial, emphasizing inconsistencies in eyewitness statements to create reasonable doubt. However, the appellate court upheld the trial court's assessment of witness credibility, reaffirming that inconsistencies in minor details may actually enhance a witness's credibility rather than diminish it. The testimonies remained consistent on essential facts, providing a coherent narrative of the events leading to the murder.

Considerations of Appeal

The appellate court reviewed the challenges posed by the appellants regarding the reliability of eyewitness accounts. The defense argued the improbability of not detecting the witnesses during the crime, yet the court noted that the perpetrators' intoxication likely contributed to their distraction. The relationships between the eyewitnesses and the victim were deemed irrelevant to their credibility, and a lack of ill motive further strengthened their testimonies.

Legal Findings

The trial court's conclusions regarding the nature of the crime were upheld. The appellate court affirmed that the killing qualified as murder under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code, detailing that abuse of superior strength was evident owing to the trio's overwhelming force against Mariano. The court noted the absence of treachery and evident premeditation, as these elements were not sufficiently substantiated by the evidence.

Sentencing and C

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.