Title
People vs. Acub y Arakani
Case
G.R. No. 220456
Decision Date
Jun 10, 2019
Accused acquitted due to lapses in drug evidence custody, failing to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt under RA 9165.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 220456)

Background of the Case

Acub was charged on February 11, 2005, with selling illegal drugs, specifically a sachet containing 0.0188 grams of shabu, during an operation led by the Zamboanga City Police. The case was subjected to trial where the prosecution presented police officers as witnesses, while Acub and his wife testified for his defense, asserting that he was wrongfully accused and arrested.

Trial Court's Findings

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found Acub guilty on November 4, 2011, upholding the presumption of regularity in the police officers' actions. The trial court dismissed Acub's claims of frame-up and lack of inventory of the seized drugs, declaring that the chain of custody was not broken and that Acub was sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of P500,000.

Court of Appeals Decision

Acub’s appeal was denied by the Court of Appeals in its March 16, 2015 decision. The appellate court affirmed the RTC's conviction, holding that the prosecution established the elements of the illegal sale of drugs and that any procedural lapses in the police's handling of the evidence did not undermine the integrity of the evidence presented.

Legal Issues Raised

Acub raised several arguments on appeal, highlighting the prosecution's noncompliance with Section 21 of the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act, which mandates specific procedures for the custody and disposal of seized drugs. He asserted that:

  1. The police failed to mark, inventory, and photograph the seized sachet in the presence of required witnesses.
  2. The prosecution provided no justifiable grounds for these failures.
  3. The absence of the informant and further proof of the buy-bust operation diminished the reliability of the evidence.
  4. The lapses constituted gaps in the chain of custody, raising doubt about the identity and integrity of the drugs.

Prosecution's Position

The Office of the Solicitor General contended that all necessary elements for conviction were established, asserting that the irregularities in police procedures did not defeat the outcome since the integrity of the evidence was maintained.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court examined whether Acub's guilt was proven beyond reasonable doubt despite the acknowledged procedural defects. It held that for a conviction of illegal sale of dangerous drugs, the prosecution must unequivocally demonstrate that a transaction occurred and that the seized item—the corpus delicti—was the same as that tested and presented in court.

Chain of Custody and Procedural Compliance

The Court underscored the critical importance of strict adherence to Section 21 of the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act to prevent evidence tampering. It stressed that minor deviations c

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.